Heat capacity of magnetic dipole in magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the heat capacity of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field, initially misrepresented in the thread title. The canonical partition function for the system is derived as Z = (4π/βμB) sinh(βμB), leading to the mean energy <E> = (1/3)(μB)²/(kBT) in the high-temperature limit. A key question raised is why, as temperature approaches infinity, all energy states of the magnetic dipole become equally probable. The explanation ties back to the ergodic hypothesis, which states that at very high temperatures, energy differences between states become negligible, making all microstates effectively equiprobable. This results in the system behaving like a micro-canonical ensemble at large temperatures.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
edit: The title is misleading, sorry. Originally I wanted to ask a question about the heat capacity but I figured it out and changed the question while forgetting to change the thread title..

Hi. OK, assume we have a classic magnetic dipole in a magnetic field with ##H= - \vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{B}##. Then you can show that the canonical partition function becomes ##Z= \frac{4 \pi}{\beta \mu B} \sinh{\beta \mu B}##, where ##\beta = 1/(k_B T)##.

Using ##Z##, you can show that the mean energy ##<E>= \frac{1}{3} \frac{(\mu B)^2}{k_B T}## in the limit ##T \rightarrow \infty##.

I have a question that isn't really specific to the system, but something more general: As temperature approaches infinity, all the energy-states for my magnetic dipole will become equally probable. Why?

According to the ergodic hypothesis, every microstate is equiprobable. So in the limit ##T## being very large, does every energy state become so small compared to ##k_B T## that they all have roughly the same energy, ~##0##? And then since they have roughly the same energy , the system effectively becomes a micro-canonical ensemble where the ergodic hypothesis applies?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Right. For large temperatures, the energy difference between the states just becomes negligible.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top