Heat engine with with state change and no cooling

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores two proposed heat engine designs that operate without a cooling mechanism, focusing on their thermodynamic processes and feasibility. The first engine utilizes solid fuel that is heated and evaporated, while the second involves a piston-cylinder system with a gaseous substance that transitions to solid. The conversation includes technical details about the operation of these engines and the implications of state changes in the working substances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a rocket engine that heats solid fuel to create a reaction mass, resulting in solid cold exhaust that can be reused, but notes potential losses in converting exhaust back to solid.
  • Another participant presents a piston-cylinder engine that uses a gaseous substance, which expands and does work as it transitions to a solid state, emphasizing that the absence of air pressure allows for useful work throughout the expansion phase.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for a thermodynamic analysis to support the claims made about the engines' operations.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about modeling state changes, indicating a gap in understanding how to analyze the proposed engines thermodynamically.
  • Another participant points out that for thrust generation, the gas must exit the vehicle, which could complicate the design of the first engine.
  • There is a suggestion that the continuous supply of energy to heat the fuel does not violate any laws of physics, indicating a level of plausibility in the proposed designs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of skepticism and support for the proposed engines, with some agreeing on the plausibility of the concepts while others highlight the need for further analysis and clarification on specific points. No consensus is reached regarding the feasibility or efficiency of the engines.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for thermodynamic analysis and modeling of state changes, indicating potential limitations in the current understanding of the proposed systems. There are also unresolved questions about the practical implications of solid exhaust collection and thrust generation.

goran d
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I will look at two different engines, which need heater, and no cooler, to operate.
First one:
A rocket engine, which, instead of burning fuel, simply heats up cold fuel in solid form so the heated and evaporated substance is used as a reaction mass. The nozzle of the rocket engine is in vacuum, so there is no limit on the exit pressure. The gas expands so much, that the vast majority of it is cooled so much that it turns back into solid. This engine starts with cold solid fuel, adds heat, does work, and then ends up again with solid cold exhaust, which can be reused. The only drawback is that there are losses as, I think, it isn't possible to convert 100% of the exhaust to solid.

The second one:
This engine doesn't have the fuel loss problem.
The engine has a cylinder and a piston that can move inside of it. For the purpose of this description we assume the volume between the piston and cylinder is minimal when the piston is in top position. In between the cylinder and the piston there is a substance that's gaseous under environment temperature, for example carbon dioxide. There is a heat exchanger in the top part of the cylinder, which can heat up to environment temperature. At the bottom side of the cylinder there is an attached vacuum camera so that the piston doesn't receive air pressure.

The engine works as follows:

Initial state: The piston is in top position. The substance is cold, mostly in solid phase, with minimal amount of gas.
Stage 1: The piston is held in top position. The heat exchanger heats up the substance until it all evaporates and reaches environment temperature, greatly increasing pressure.
Stage 2: The piston moves down. The substance expands, and pushes the piston, doing work in the process. The expansion continues until the substance is so cold that it solidifies, leaving only negligible amount of gas. Note that due to no air pressure on the piston, the expansion does useful work during the whole stage 2, since it doesn't need to overcome air pressure.
Stage 3: The piston moves up, doing work on the remaining gas, compressing it. It continues until it reaches top position. Note that the useful work in stage 2 is much greater than the work in stage 3, since in stage 3 only a negligible amount of gas is compressed.
At the end of Stage 3, the engine is back in the initial position.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Did you do, or rather you should do a thermodynamic analysis to back up your claims.

This engine starts with cold solid fuel, adds heat, does work, and then ends up again with solid cold exhaust, which can be reused
One problem is the collection of the "solid cold exhaust" for reuse.
 
"Did you do, or rather you should do a thermodynamic analysis to back up your claims."

Unfortunately I don't know how to model state change.
 
goran d said:
The gas expands so much, that the vast majority of it is cooled so much that it turns back into solid. This engine starts with cold solid fuel, adds heat, does work, and then ends up again with solid cold exhaust, which can be reused.

The gas MUST leave the vehicle in order to generate thrust.

Stage 2: The piston moves down. The substance expands, and pushes the piston, doing work in the process. The expansion continues until the substance is so cold that it solidifies, leaving only negligible amount of gas. Note that due to no air pressure on the piston, the expansion does useful work during the whole stage 2, since it doesn't need to overcome air pressure.
Stage 3: The piston moves up, doing work on the remaining gas, compressing it. It continues until it reaches top position. Note that the useful work in stage 2 is much greater than the work in stage 3, since in stage 3 only a negligible amount of gas is compressed.
At the end of Stage 3, the engine is back in the initial position.

This seems plausible to me, as you would need a continuous supply of energy to heat the "fuel" up, so it doesn't seem to violate any laws of physics to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K