Heat transfer via air cooling -- which airflow direction is best?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the efficiency of heat transfer when cooling coffee using a fan, specifically examining the impact of airflow direction—blowing air onto the coffee versus sucking air away from it. The conversation explores theoretical aspects of heat transfer and practical implications of fan placement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes using a fan to cool coffee and questions whether blowing air down or sucking air away is more efficient.
  • Another participant suggests that if the fan is too low, it may hinder airflow into the fan, potentially affecting cooling efficiency.
  • A different participant states that the rate of cooling is proportional to the heat transfer film coefficient, which depends on the velocity of air at the coffee's surface, indicating that faster air movement leads to faster cooling.
  • Another contribution explains that fans create a low-pressure area that draws in air from all directions, suggesting that blowing air is more effective than sucking it away for forced convection cooling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of airflow direction for cooling, with no consensus reached on which method is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention variables affecting heat transfer, such as the heat transfer film coefficient and air velocity, but do not resolve how these interact with the specific setup described.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in heat transfer, thermodynamics, or practical applications of cooling methods may find this discussion relevant.

freeelectron
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Most efficient heat transfer based on airflow direction
I'm using a stainless steel pan and a fan to cool my coffee down as quickly as possible.
Usually, I have the fan blowing down towards the coffee, but this morning I flipped it over to suck the heat out of the coffee and I'm wondering which of the two is the most efficient, especially as, in the second case, if you lower the fan enough, you clearly start to feel a pulling force due to the vacuum.

Any thoughts?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • coffee.jpg
    coffee.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 148
Science news on Phys.org
freeelectron said:
TL;DR Summary: Most efficient heat transfer based on airflow direction

if you lower the fan enough, you clearly start to feel a pulling force due to the vacuum.
In that case, your fan is just a little bit too low, as you are hindering the movement of air into the fan.
Put it much lower and you might be able to suck up some of the coffee into the fan too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
The rate of cooling is proportional to the rate of heat transfer. There are a number of variables that control the rate of heat transfer. The most important of those variables is the heat transfer film coefficient between the air and the coffee. The value of that film coefficient is proportional to the velocity of the air at the surface of the coffee. Faster air movement at the surface equals faster cooling.

It's easy to test this using a thermometer in the coffee and a clock.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: freeelectron
Fans generate a low pressure area behind them that sucks-in air from all directions. On the discharge side they direct a coherent column of air. So for forced, open convection the column of air provides higher velocity at the thing you want to cool. Blow is better than suck.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: freeelectron, nsaspook, Lnewqban and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K