Heating of solid - interatomic potential

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between interatomic potential and the thermal expansion of solids. Participants explore how changes in temperature affect interatomic distances as represented in potential energy graphs, specifically referencing models like the Lennard-Jones potential.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the energy minimum in interatomic potential graphs corresponds to equilibrium spacing at absolute zero and suggests that at nonzero temperatures, the energy distribution leads to increased interatomic distances.
  • Another participant explains that the asymmetry of the potential curve causes the equilibrium spacing to increase with temperature, leading to the expansion of solids when heated, while ignoring entropic effects.
  • A participant references a book for further illustration, emphasizing the importance of graphical representation in understanding the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the general interpretation of how interatomic potential relates to thermal expansion, but the discussion does not reach a consensus on the specifics of the graphical representation or the implications of entropic effects.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address potential limitations or assumptions regarding the models used, nor does it explore the implications of entropic effects in detail.

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi!

In a book it said that it can be clearly seen from the interatomic potential (such as the Lennard Jones) that when a solid is heated it expands.

Please explain how is it exactly manifested by the interatomic potential graph?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The interpretation is that the energy minimum in a plot of atomic spacing vs. energy (e.g., a Lennard Jones-type chart) corresponds to the equilibrium spacing at absolute zero. At nonzero temperatures, the energy will lie above this point, and there will be a distribution of interatomic distance values that corresponds to the width of the dip in the potential curve. The midpoint of the horizontal connecting line thus approximates the equilibrium spacing at nonzero temperatures. Since the potential curve is asymmetric and skewed towards the right (i.e., greater spacing), the equilibrium spacing increases with temperature and therefore solids expand when heated (ignoring entropic effects).

Does this make sense? It's easier shown graphically than explained verbally. Put another way, if interatomic potential vs. spacing were simply a parabola, then solids wouldn't expand when heated because even at increased energy levels the midpoint would always lie directly above the minima, and the average spacing would equal the spacing at absolute zero. This isn't the case with actual potential curves, however, where the midpoint moves to the right.
 
Last edited:
Alright thanks:]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K