sadhu
- 155
- 0
why do visible light have less heating affect than infra red radiations ,in spite of the fact that photon of visible light have more energy...
pixel01 said:OK, visible light have more energy than IR. But the percentage of total energy to heat the absober may be less .
russ_watters said:It doesn't. Visible light is more energetic, which means for the same number of photons, you get more heat when you absorb it.
Think about conservation of energy, where does the energy from the light go? What happens if you shine visible light on a black surface? What happens if you shine the same amount of visible light on a white surface? Are most surfaces "black" or "white" to infra red?sadhu said:why do visible light have less heating affect than infra red radiations ,in spite of the fact that photon of visible light have more energy...
Fluorescent lamps produce mostly UV light. When the UV strikes the coating on the lamp, it causes the coating to fluoresce, emitting visible light.sadhu said:ok then why does a fluorescent tube is less hot then a bulb after sane time
certainly glass absorbs far more infra red radiations than visible light , but the thing is same with other substances , otherwise why don't we use a bulb to warm the room instead of heater of same power ..?
No one said you did. But it is a logical contradiction that you were operating under, to believe something that was more energetic could produce less heat.sadhu said:well i never said that IR is more energetic
Exactly. Assuming that they are all completely absorbed 1 W of IR heats the same as 1 W of UV which heats the same as 1 W of visible light which heats the same as 1 W of radio ...sadhu said:ok then you mean to say that visible light have same heating affect like IR provided they are absorbed by the substances ...
and a heater and bulb of same power will heat a room equally
thanks now i get it...