Heating Water Beyond Super-Heated Steam: A Middle-Schooler's Question

AI Thread Summary
Heating water beyond super-heated steam is possible, resulting in hotter steam until a critical temperature is reached. At extremely high temperatures, the steam can lose electrons, transitioning into a plasma state. This process involves complex physics, but the basic concept is that water can exist in various states depending on temperature and pressure. The discussion emphasizes that curiosity about science is valuable, regardless of the complexity of the subject. Understanding these states is a stepping stone to deeper scientific knowledge.
Sorentos
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello I am not a science scholar but just a gifted middle-schooler. Anyway i was wondering, is it possible to heat water past super-heated steam? If it does then what does it turn into?

And please don't mock me if this is a stupid question because I see the forums and see over-complicated equations that i won't start learning until another 5 years.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top