Heavy Load Motor-Generator (Dynamotor) Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter TRBob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the feasibility and specifications of using a motor-generator (dynamotor) system for a gravitational potential energy storage application, specifically for lifting a load of 10 to 300 tonnes up a steep incline. Participants explore technical possibilities, cost estimates, and efficiency considerations related to this system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that using a motor-generator to lift a heavy load for energy storage is technically possible, suggesting it as a straightforward means of storing energy.
  • Others express skepticism about the viability of this method for energy storage, noting that lifting a large weight may not store as much energy as expected and could be more costly than anticipated.
  • One participant mentions that motors and generators are generally efficient, estimating an overall efficiency of around 70-75% after accounting for drive losses.
  • A participant inquires about the availability of larger motor-generators, noting that they have only found models up to 2 HP and are seeking manufacturers that produce larger units suitable for their application.
  • Another participant calculates that lifting 300 tonnes through 500 meters could yield approximately 409 kWh of energy, suggesting that the load could potentially be reduced.
  • There is a suggestion that an AC induction motor could be used as a generator, indicating a possible avenue for finding a suitable motor-generator for the proposed system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement on the technical feasibility of the motor-generator system while also highlighting significant concerns regarding cost and efficiency. Multiple competing views remain regarding the practicality and effectiveness of this energy storage method.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not resolved the specific assumptions regarding the cost and efficiency of the motor-generator system, nor have they established definitive parameters for the required mass and height for effective energy storage.

TRBob
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The motor-generator will be used to pull a load up a mountain side/steep incline on a rail system, the load is between 10 and 300 tonnes, its for a gravitational potential energy storage system. Excess electricity pulls the load up the incline, when there is demand for electricity the load is released driving the generator. Obviously a good gearing system is required.

Is this technically possible? How much do you estimate one would cost? What would be the device's efficiency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
TRBob said:
The motor-generator will be used to pull a load up a mountain side/steep incline on a rail system, the load is between 10 and 300 tonnes, its for a gravitational potential energy storage system. Excess electricity pulls the load up the incline, when there is demand for electricity the load is released driving the generator. Obviously a good gearing system is required.

Is this technically possible?
Welcome to PF! Absolutely, it is technically possible. It's a relatively straightforward means of storing energy.
How much do you estimate one would cost?
There's a big difference between 10 and 300 tonnes and a bunch of different ways of doing it, so it's pretty hard to just pull a cost estimate out of the air. Expensive, though, since you have to build a structure that can support your chosen mass.
What would be the device's efficiency?
Motors and generators are both pretty efficient, so depending on how serious of an estimate you need, start with 95% each, off the top of my head. Then take another 20% off for drive losses. So you might be able to see around an overall 70-75% efficiency.

I'm not sure where you're going with your question, but if you're trying to think if this would be a viable means of energy storage either for a home or on an industrial scale - probably not. The main reason is that lifting a big weight stores less energy than most people realize, which means that storing a useful amount of energy costs a lot more than people realize. That's why pumped water is more often used - if the geology is right, you don't even have to build a tank for it!
 
I've been searching for a suitable motor-generator (Dynamotor), but the largest I have found is a mere 2 HP! Does anyone know of any manufacturers that produce larger ones?

The system would be used in a small remote community (with suitable topography) to store energy generated by an intermittant renewable source.
 
Did you calculate how big of a mass you need and how far you need to lift it to store the capacity you want?
 
Initially 300 tonnes, raised through 500 metres, not accounting for transmission losses I got 409 kWh, which is quite a lot, so the load could be reduced some what. I'm more interested in the motor-generator though, whether ones exist that could be applied to this problem and if so how much they cost.
 
TRBob said:
Initially 300 tonnes, raised through 500 metres, not accounting for transmission losses I got 409 kWh, which is quite a lot, so the load could be reduced some what. I'm more interested in the motor-generator though, whether ones exist that could be applied to this problem and if so how much they cost.
Wow, that's quite a mass and quite a height.

So are you looking for a motor/generator more on the order of 100 kW? I think you may need to find a manufacturer for a dedicated product, but it is my understanding that an ac induction motor can be used as a generator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K