What's the General Consensus on Heim Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hadsed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
hadsed
Messages
492
Reaction score
2
I've just been doing some reading on Heim theory and I wanted to know what the general consensus about this was. It seems to have some similarities with string theory and LQG (though I only took a cursory look, also my math skills aren't fully developed enough to understand it all).

Anyway, can anyone comment on this? I'd love to read on this further as it seems interesting but if it's a crackpot sort of thing...

Here's a link to the wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heim_Theory
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It generally sounds like ok idea. But ,you know, there is a lot of good ideas that have not been jumped on (hence not fully clarified) because of the off beat track they have taken. It is only natural, there are many pressures in the works.

The idea of geometrical-statistical method is music to my ears plus the no quark, it is similar to my own(profile).
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...

Similar threads

Back
Top