Help a Physics Student with Two Dim. Oscilator Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter noamriemer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscilator
noamriemer
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am new here...
I am a physics student, seeking for help. There is something I just can't seem to understand...
Your help will be much appreciated...

In my exercise, I have the following Hamiltonian:
H=\frac{p_x^2}{2m}+\frac{p_y^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 (x^2+y^2)+\lambda xy

I was supposed to find a transformation for which there will be no "linked" coordinates. This is what I came up with:
H=\frac{p_a^2}{2m}+\frac{p_b^2}{2m}+\frac{a^2}{2}(m\omega^2+\lambda)+\frac{b^2}{2}(m\omega^2-\lambda)

I need to find the transition matrix. And here I am facing my problems:
The matrix is given by:
H=\left \langle u_i|H|u_j \right \rangle= \left \langle u_i|v_j \right \rangle\left \langle v_j|H|v_l \right \rangle\left \langle v_l \right |u_j\rangle

But I can't understand... what are the u_j ?
Does it refer to the coordinates- so in my case it will be:
H=\left \langle x|H|y \right \rangle= \left \langle x|b \right \rangle\left \langle b|H|a \right \rangle\left \langle a \right |y\rangle

If it is so: what does |x\rangle mean?

Thank you all so much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first part you need to add and subtract terms such that there is no x*y term, or in other words, the equation can be separated into two independent equations, each dependent on only one co-ordinate.
So if you can write the equation in a new co-ordinate system a and b, like you have, then yes, it is what is required as it can be separated into two independent equations.

As for the second part, I am not a 100% about this, but ui and uj should not be the co-ordinates.
 
noamriemer said:
If it is so: what does |x\rangle mean?

This is a purely localized state. A particle (wavefunction) that has an exact, 100% accurate position, but totally undefined momentum. You can imagine it as a delta function with a peak at position x. I like to think that it's the image of a drop just hitting the surface of water.
 
Thank you, guys... you've been great help!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top