Help explaining the ion-electron recombination process

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ion-electron recombination process, specifically how a free electron transitions to a lower energy state to form a neutral hydrogen atom from a hydrogen ion (proton). It highlights that the initial state of the electron may not be an eigenstate, leading to a superposition of emitted frequencies during the transition. The process is likened to moving from a high energy level (n=infinity) down to the ground state, with the understanding that transitions can involve various energy levels rather than just adjacent ones. Conservation of quantities like angular momentum is emphasized, as it must change with each emitted photon. Overall, the recombination involves complex quantum mechanics where arbitrary states can emit photons that are superpositions of different energy states.
papernuke
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I don't know the process in which a free electron finds its way back down to the ground state of a hydrogen ion and thus forming a neutral hydrogen atom.

I have tried my hand at Googling the topic, but I can't seem to find any detailed websites about the electron-ion recombination for hydrogen H ions (a proton).

Could someone please help explain the process or direct to a link?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A free electron can still be decomposed into spherical harmonics around an ion. So it's the same process as electron simply going from a higher energy level to a lower one. The difference is that initial state might not be an eigen state of your system, so you would probably end up with a superposition of frequencies being emitted. But since all of these will be nearly degenerate, it won't really matter.
 
So in terms of the energy levels, is it like simply having the new electron start at n=infinity or some other high n and undergoes transitions down?

K^2 said:
The difference is that initial state might not be an eigen state of your system, so you would probably end up with a superposition of frequencies being emitted. But since all of these will be nearly degenerate, it won't really matter.
And could you please explain this bit again in simpler terms?
 
I don't think a transition has to be from one energy level to the next one up or down. It can be almost any jump, especially when moving down energy levels. I think at least.
 
Drakkith said:
I don't think a transition has to be from one energy level to the next one up or down. It can be almost any jump, especially when moving down energy levels. I think at least.
So long as conserved quantities are conserved, yes. So angular momentum, for example, has to change by one per emitted photon.

papermuke said:
And could you please explain this bit again in simpler terms?
Only certain states can be written as specific l,m,n combination. An arbitrary state has to be written as some linear combination of these. Energy an arbitrary state needs to lose to go to ground state also isn't going to be exactly equal to any of the available transitions. But that's kind of the point of the quantum mechanics. You can emit a photon that's in superposition of several different energy states. And that's what will have to happen as free electron gets captured.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top