Help identifying unknown chemicals.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bhajack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemicals
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying nine unknown white solids, including various oxides, sulfates, nitrates, and carbonates. The participant seeks advice on using available reagents like water, hydrochloric acid, and silver nitrate to differentiate these compounds. Suggestions include analyzing the solubility of each solid in water and utilizing a branching diagram to narrow down the possibilities based on chemical reactions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the reactions of each compound with the provided reagents. Overall, the thread highlights a methodical approach to chemical identification through logical reasoning and research.
Bhajack
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have 9 white solids which i need to identify. Aluminium ocide (Al2O3), Calcium Oxide (CaO), Sodium dithionite (Na2S2O4), aluminium sulphate ( Al2(SO4)3 ), Ammonium sulphate (NH4)2SO4, calcium nitrate ( Ca(NO3)2 ), Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), Sodium thiosulphate (Na2S2O3), Zinc carbonate (ZnCO3).

The reagents i have are: water, Hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, silver nitrate solution, ammonium hydroxide and barium chloride.

Any ideas on how to single a few out would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
You want to start by fuguring what the reactions of each of them with each of the reagents would be.
i.e. do any of them look like they should dissolve in water?
 
I find sometimes it is easiest to turn this into a branching diagram. You keep creating new branches until you are left with the one compound. Like Simon said, find out what they react with and go from there. Your first branch could be "Does it dissolve in water".
 
A lot of those compounds are in materials databases - you can look up how they react with the different reagents.
Then it's mostly an exercise in logic.

Since it's been almost a month without feedback I guess the exercise is over and I wasn't really all that much help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top