Help (illusion) | Get Assistance Now

  • Thread starter Thread starter ermines
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a visual illusion involving shapes that appear to be triangles. Participants analyze the area calculations of these shapes, revealing a discrepancy between the total area calculated for a supposed triangle and the sum of the areas of the individual components. The total area calculated as 32.5 contradicts the summed areas of the individual pieces, which total 32. This contradiction suggests that the shapes in question do not form a true triangle. The analysis highlights that the small dark green shape is a right triangle with legs 2 and 5, while the larger red shape is a right triangle with legs 3 and 8, indicating they are not congruent. Additionally, there is a note about the inability to view an attached image, with instructions on how to properly insert images in the forum.
ermines
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Help... (illusion)

could someone figure out the answer...
 

Attachments

  • redirector.gif
    redirector.gif
    18.4 KB · Views: 593
Physics news on Phys.org
...excuse me, but why can't i see the .gif i attached...
 
Are either of those shapes actually triangles? Look carefully at the intersection of the diagonal with the grid. Or calculate the slopes of the diagonal lines.
 
I think Damgo is right.

If you calculate the area of the whole "triangle" you get:

Area = (1/2)*(13*5) = 32.5

However if you calculate the area of each individual piece you get:

Red: = (1/2)*(8*3) = 12
Light Green: = 8
Dark Green: = (1/2)*(5*2) = 5
Yellow: = 7

Adding these values up we get a total area of 32.

There is a contradiction here, therefore there is something fishy going on, and I think it has to do with the assumption that the apparent triangles are truly triangles.
 
The four shapes do not come together to make a triangle. The small triangle (dark green) is a right triangle with legs 2 and 5; the large triangle (red) is a right triangle with legs 3 and 8. They are not congruent.

P.S.: You cannot see the attached image because it is an attachment. Veiw the attachment by selecting the link. If you want to insert an image, you will have to use IMG tags. https://www.physicsforums.com/misc.php?action=bbcode#imgcode
 
Last edited by a moderator:
so my answer was right, yehey...
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top