Help in convention, radiation and conduction

AI Thread Summary
A turbine is not classified as an example of convection, despite involving fluids or gases. Vents do not exemplify radiation; instead, they facilitate airflow. Heavy drapes are not a direct example of conduction, as they primarily provide insulation. Window tints can reflect heat, aligning them more closely with radiation principles. White tiles do not represent radiation but can affect how walls absorb it.
lynn0808
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
is a turbine an example of convention? (because it is a fluid or gas)
are vents an example of radiation?
are heavy drapes an example of conduction?
are window tints an example of radiation? because it is a reflector of heat
are white tiles and paint an example of radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please don't start another thread to clarify your question, do it in the original thread.

I am afraid it is still not possible to answer you question. White tiles are not an example of radiation. Visible light or X-rays can be examples of radiation. Presence of white tiles can influence the way wall absorbs radiation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top