A Help in understanding this derivation of Lagrange Equations in Non-Holonomic case

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kashmir
  • Start date Start date
Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
1695703266197.png

I dont Understand how we get the final equations relating ##Q_r## with ##\lambda## given the conditions above?
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Virtual work of constraint forces in Hamilton’s principle
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Understanding Holonomic Constraints: Common Questions and Answers
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Why is Hamilton's Principle assumed to be valid for non-holonomic systems?
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
A Find Euler-Lagrange Equations w/Given Init Pos & Vel
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
A Explicit non-holonomic equations of motion
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Requirement of Holonomic Constraints for Deriving Lagrange Equations
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Understanding Holonomic Constraints in Lagrangian Mechanics
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
The Lagrange equations from mechanics
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Can Any Quantifiable Variable Serve as a Coordinate in Euler-Lagrange Equations?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K