Help me make a very mathematical encryption algorithm

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a mathematical encryption algorithm based on a password system with specific constraints. It explores the construction of bijective and injective functions to map passwords to numerical sets and discusses the representation of integers as binary matrices. The idea of using matrix exponentiation to create an injective function is proposed, specifically raising a 16x16 binary matrix to the 69th power. The conversation also touches on the bit requirements for storing these representations, concluding that 105 bits are necessary for a uniform distribution of the passwords. The final approach suggests defining the function g(M) = M^69 for the binary matrix representations.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
Suppose I make an application with a password of max 20 characters -- no special characters and not case-sensitive. So that means there is a 1-to-1 correspondence between the set of all passwords P and the set S = {1, 2, ..., 3720 - 1, 3720}. A simple bijective function f:P-->S could be constructed. Then I want to construct another bijective function g:S-->T for some set T. Any ideas?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Hey Jamin2112.

What properties do you want your bijective function to have?
 
chiro said:
Hey Jamin2112.

What properties do you want your bijective function to have?

Actually, it doesn't have to be bijective, now that I think about it. Could be merely injective.

Maybe take the binary representation of the numbers and have each of those digits correspond to parameters in a differential equation?
 
What is the quantization scheme you want to use for the parameters and what is the state space for the DE model?
 
chiro said:
What is the quantization scheme you want to use for the parameters and what is the state space for the DE model?

Scratch that. I'm going to need something simpler than a differential equation.

Let's assume the ints 1, 2, ..., 3720 are represented with 64 bits. Convert the binary representation of each to an 8 x 8 matrix of 0's and 1's. Then raise that matrix to, say, the 69th power. Now we have to assume that this makes for an injective function. Is that too much to assume?
 
One small problem:

log_2(37^20) = 20*log_2(37) = 30*ln(37)/ln(2) = 104.1891 which means if you have a uniform distribution with those values, you will need at least 105 bits to store them.
 
chiro said:
One small problem:

log_2(37^20) = 20*log_2(37) = 30*ln(37)/ln(2) = 104.1891 which means if you have a uniform distribution with those values, you will need at least 105 bits to store them.

Make 'em 16 x 16 matrices. We've got a 256-bit machine.
 
So what do you want your function to be exactly (given this 16x16 matrix)?
 
chiro said:
So what do you want your function to be exactly (given this 16x16 matrix)?

g(M) = M69 where M ε ℝ16x16

Lets assume that if the only possible M in the domain are those binary matrix representations of the numbers 1 through 3720, we have an injective function.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top