Help Needed: Solving Integer Equations with GCD = 1 - Angelo Spina

  • Thread starter Thread starter angelo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gcd Integer
angelo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a visitor of this beautiful site, my name is Angelo Spina, I would like to resolve the three following problems, in fact after many attempts I have not succeeded in it, for this reason I kindly ask you to give me a help.


PROBLEM 1.

If the equation y² + a p² = 2 x² (where a is a positive integer, p is an odd prime number) admits a solution (y,x) of integers with gcd(y,x)=1, how can I prove that the equation y² + p² = 2 x² also admits a solution (y,x) of integers with gcd(y,x)=1 ?


PROBLEM 2.

If the two equations y² + p² = 2 x² , y² + q² = 2 x² (where p and q are odd prime numbers) respectively admit the integer solutions (y',x') and (y '', x '') with gcd(y',x')=1 and gcd(y'',x'')=1, how can I prove that the equation y² + (pq)² = 2 x² also admits at least an integer solution (y*,x *) with gcd(y*,x*)=1 ? Is it possible to find a formula that allows to obtain (y*,x *) from the knowledge of (y',x') and (y '', x '') ?


PROBLEM 3.

If the equation y² + n² = 2 x² (where n is a positive integer greater than 3) admits integer solutions con gcd = 1, how can I prove that the equations
y² + p² = 2 x², y² + q² = 2 x², y² + r² = 2 x², y² + s² = 2 x²,..., (where p, q, r, s,...are the prime factors of n) also admit integer solutions con gcd=1?


Certain of your courtesy, I thank you very much.

Angelo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and Welcome :biggrin:

Please can you tell us any work you have been able to do on this so far.
 
May I ask where these question arise from? If it's a basic course in number theory and you've done certain topics presumably these topics are of use in solving the problem (is there a similar problem in the notes/book that is solved)? Roughly what knowledge does this require to solve. If this is a problem from a class field theory text nook then we almost certainly won't know the answer. If its taken from a textbook at a level where observations such as 2 is a quadratic residue mod p^2 and a is a residue mod x^2 and 2x^2 are what the other proofs in the book/notes near to this one are involved then we possibly can help.
 
The solution starts with the simple identity that if Z is an odd square then (Z-1)/8 equals a triangular number, say A(A+1)/2. Set A(A+1)/2-A(A+1) = -A(A+1)/2 and make the substitution A = (X-1)/2. Multiply both sides of the resulting equation by 8 and substract 1 from each side gives Y^2-2X^2=-Z^2 or Y^2 + Z^2=2*X^2. This solves problems 2 and 3.
 
Last edited:
I posted the message on 7/2 before leaving to visit relatives. I then realized that my answer gave gcd > 1. I didn't have access to a computer but tried to work the "problem" with using a simple calculator. Unfortunately I used the equation y^2 + 2*x^2 = P^2 instead of y^2 + P^2 = 2*x^2. I will save this work for a separate post. As to the current problem I think the relation 2((x-y)^2+x^2)=(2x-y)^2 + y^2 will help. Simply use the well known relation for Pythagorean triples to get (x-y)^2 + x^2 = X^2 and set P= 2x-y this will give a general equation for solutions to Y^2 + P^2 = 2X^2 but I don't know if it is inclusive of all solutions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top