Help: Proving the tending of an integral

[Beowulf2007]

Homework Statement

Given the integral f(t) = \int_{t}^{2t} e^{-x^2} dx

How do I then prove that f(t) = 0 if t tends to infinity?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I can that if I make t goes from minus infinity to zero, then the limit will tend to 1, but when making it tend to infinity then I get a limit which is zero.

But this cannot be proof enough can it?

Cheers,
Beowulf.

 

[HallsofIvy]

Homework Statement

Given the integral f(t) = \int_{t}^{2t} e^{-x^2} dx

How do I then prove that f(t) = 0 if t tends to infinity?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I can that if I make t goes from minus infinity to zero, then the limit will tend to 1, but when making it tend to infinity then I get a limit which is zero.

But this cannot be proof enough can it?

Cheers,
Beowulf.

Well, it might be! How do you "get a limit which is zero"?

I would be inclined to use the "integral mean value theorem":
"If f(x) is continuous on [a, b], then there is at least one number c in (a, b) for which
\int_a^b f(t)dt= f(c)(b-a)".

So
\int_t^{2t} e^{-x^2} dt= e^{-c^2}(2t- t)= te^{-c^2}
where c lies between t and 2t. The crucial point is that c> t so that, for t> 0,
0< te^{-c^2}< te^{-t^2}
Now, what is the limit of that as t goes to infinity?

 

[Beowulf2007]

Well, it might be! How do you "get a limit which is zero"?

I would be inclined to use the "integral mean value theorem":
"If f(x) is continuous on [a, b], then there is at least one number c in (a, b) for which
\int_a^b f(t)dt= f(c)(b-a)".

So
\int_t^{2t} e^{-x^2} dt= e^{-c^2}(2t- t)= te^{-c^2}
where c lies between t and 2t. The crucial point is that c> t so that, for t> 0,
0< te^{-c^2}< te^{-t^2}
Now, what is the limit of that as t goes to infinity?

Hi

Then limit must be

\mathop{\lim} \limits_{t \to \infty} te^{-t^2} = 0, then assuming this is true then f(x1) an f(x2) then tend to the same limit since f is continious (by the mvt), and therefore
the integral f(t) -> 0, then t tends to infinity?

q.e.d.

Cheers,
Beowulf and thanks your reply

p.s. How does this look?

p.p.s. Is enough to assume that f is continious by the mvt or do I need to show it part of the proof?