HELP : Q12 of Ch. 02 of Fundamentals of Physics, Resnick

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a plant that doubles in height each week, reaching the height of a building on the 25th day. Participants clarify that the problem does not involve kinematics but rather geometric progression. By working backward from the 25th day, it is determined that the plant was half the height of the building on the 18th day and one-fourth the height on the 11th day. The solution emphasizes understanding the exponential growth pattern of the plant. The conversation concludes with a sense of clarity and appreciation for the insights shared.
dawoodvora
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rapidly growing plant doubles in height each week. At the end of the 25th day, the plant reaches the height of a building. At what time was the plant one-fourth the height of the building?


Homework Equations


The problem is a part of chapter which deals only with linear kinematics. But I cannot understand, which part of 4, general kinematic equation, I must apply.

The Attempt at a Solution


It looks like a case of geometric progression, But I am not able to get a start
Also, I tried to start it by actually creating a table where there are three columns.
column 1 = no. of weeks
column 2 = initial height
column 3 = final height.

After that I drew blank.....
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work backwards from the time that the plant was the height of the building. When was it 1/2 the height of the building? When was it 1/4 the height of the building?

This problem has nothing to do with kinematics.
 
Hello Mark44,
U r DAMN RIGHT!

Once, I saw through your eyes, the prob was as clear as water

On 25th day height is h
On (25-7)= 18, height will be h/2
On (18-7) = 11, height will be (h/2)/2 = h/4

Beauty......

ThnX......a LooooooooooooooooooooT
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top