Help solving a third degree polynomial

[jeffmarina]

Homework Statement

x^2(4x + 13) = 9

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Answers are that x = -3, -1 and 3/4. But how can one compute this other than trial and error?

 

[gabbagabbahey]

First step is to try expanding it into the form Ax^3 +Bx^2+Cx+D=0. What do you get when you do this?

 

[jeffmarina]

4x^3 + 13x^2 +0x -9 = 0

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Okay good, you can get rid of the 0x term though :)

The next step is to recognize that since this is a third degree polynomial, there will be three roots; let's call them x_1, x_2, and x_3. This means that 4(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)=0=4x^3+13x^2-9. Expand the expression on the left. What do you get?

 

[HallsofIvy]

If you did not already know the solutions, you could use the "rational root theorem": if x= m/n is a rational number satisfying a polynomial equation then n must evenly divide the leading coefficient and m must evenly divide the constant term.

Here, those are 4 and -9. The integers that evenly divide 4 are \pm 1, \pm 2 and \pm 4. The integers that evenly divide 9 are \pm 1, \pm 3, and \pm 9. That means that the only possible rational roots are \pm 1, \pm 1/2, \pm 1/4, \pm 3, \pm 3/2, \pm 3/4, \pm 9, \pm 9/2, and \pm 9/4. Check each of those to see if one of them satisfies the equation. (And notice that the solutions you give are among those.)

See mathworld.wolfram.com/CubicFormula.html

Of course, there exist cubic equations that have no rational roots. In such a case, you would have to use the (extremely complicated) cubic formula.

 

[Defennder]

Okay good, you can get rid of the 0x term though :)

The next step is to recognize that since this is a third degree polynomial, there will be three roots; let's call them x_1, x_2, and x_3. This means that 4(x-x_1)(x-x_2)(x-x_3)=0=4x^3+13x^2-9. Expand the expression on the left. What do you get?

Hi, gabba just want to make sure I understand your method here. Is it possible that this may not work for some polynomials since we may end up with a cubic equation of a variable say x_1 ? Which of course leads us back to square one.

 

[gabbagabbahey]

Hi, gabba just want to make sure I understand your method here. Is it possible that this may not work for some polynomials since we may end up with a cubic equation of a variable say x_1 ? Which of course leads us back to square one.

Yes, you bring up a good point that I had neglected to mention. If the polynomial in question happens to be a perfect cube, then this method won't get you anywhere. However if it is a perfect cube, when you put the polynomial into the form x^3+C_1x^2+C_2x+C_3, the constant term C_3 will be the cube of the triple root as we can see from the fact that (x-a)^3=x^3-3ax^2+3a^2x-a^3.

 

[Defennder]

But is this guaranteed to work if the polynomial isn't a perfect cube ? ie. One would only have to work with quadratics at most ?