Help Solving Astrophysics Textbook Question

girlinphysics
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I have a question in my astrophysics textbook that I need some help with.

Given \frac{dT}{dr}\propto\frac{\kappa\rho{L}}{r^2T^3} and \frac{dL}{dr}\propto{r^2}{\rho}\epsilon show that L\propto {M^{5.4}} and R\propto {M^{0.2}} if \kappa\propto\rho{T^{-3.5}} and \epsilon\propto\rho{T^{5}}.

Using the equation \frac{dT}{dr}\propto\frac{\kappa\rho{L}}{r^2T^3} and substituting the value for \kappa and also \rho\propto{\frac{M}{R^3}} I got the answer L\propto {M^{5.5}R^{-0.5}}

Then using \frac{dL}{dr}\propto{r^2}{\rho}\epsilon and substituting \epsilon\propto\rho{T^{5}} as well as \rho\propto{\frac{M}{R^3}} and the result from above I got M^{2.5}\propto{R}

Obviously I have done something wrong. I'm a little slow in tex but if you would like my full working in order to help me just let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem you give is underconstrained. After substituting for epsilon and rho, your first equation gives L as a function of R, M, and T, yet you express it as purely a function of R and M. What happened to T? Also, you are told a second way to express L as a function of R, M, and T, so by equating the two, all you get is one equation involving R, M, and T, which cannot be solved for R as a function of M alone. You are missing a constraint on T. To find it, think physically about what you have already asserted about the star, and what is missing.

The equations you give are the equation of radiative diffusion, and the equation of energy generation. What you are missing is the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium, which is dP/dr = -rho*g. That brings in the pressure P, which you have to get rid of using the ideal gas equation. You should see that T is proportional to M/R, and if you put that into what you have above, you should get the answer you want.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top