Help understanding metric units

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomtomtom1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Units
tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
Hi all

Firstly this is not a homework question. I just found myself wondering what certain numbers meant while at work and realized that i didnt actually know hence the posting.

I was hoping someone could help explain & confirm a couple of things about units.

1) Given the number 4.172 meters
I interpret this number at 4 whole meters
And the 0.172 part I interpret as a portion of a whole meter
My first question is this; is 0.172 (the fractional part) still in meters or is this in cm?

2) Assuming that 0.172 is in meter then to understand the 0.172m a little better I have done the following:-

1 ● 1 / 10 1 / 100 1 / 1000
0 ● 1 7 2

I have re-writtern this fractional part as 172/1000

My understanding at this point is that the denomniator (1000) represents my whole meter and the numerator represents the portion of the whole meter
Is this correct?


Attached is a PDF document where i have tried to understand more about units which i was hoping someone could look at.
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
tomtomtom1 said:
1) Given the number 4.172 meters
I interpret this number at 4 whole meters
And the 0.172 part I interpret as a portion of a whole meter
My first question is this; is 0.172 (the fractional part) still in meters or is this in cm?
If I give you 1/2=0.5 apples, I give you 1/2 of an apple and not 1/2 of [something else].
If I give you 3.5 apples, I give you 3 apples and 1/2 apple and not 3 apples and 1/2 of [something else].

2) Assuming that 0.172 is in meter then to understand the 0.172m a little better I have done the following:-

1 ● 1 / 10 1 / 100 1 / 1000
0 ● 1 7 2

I have re-writtern this fractional part as 172/1000

My understanding at this point is that the denomniator (1000) represents my whole meter and the numerator represents the portion of the whole meter
Is this correct?
It is correct, and you can get the same just with rewriting the numeric value:
3.172 meters = (3172/1000) meters = (3 + ##\frac{172}{1000}##) meters
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top