Help understanding proof involving Maxwell equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter U.Renko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding a proof involving Maxwell's equations, specifically the derivation of the wave equation from Maxwell-Ampere's law when the current density \(\vec{J}\) is zero. A key point of confusion is the step where the time derivative is taken outside the curl operator, which is justified because partial derivatives commute due to the continuity of the functions involved. The participants clarify that the equality \(\mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec{E}}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\left(\nabla\times\vec{E}\right)}{\partial t}\) holds true. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these mathematical properties to follow the proof correctly. Overall, the conversation aids in clarifying the application of mathematical methods in physics, particularly in the context of electromagnetic theory.
U.Renko
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
help understanding "proof" involving Maxwell equation

I'm currently taking a course on mathematical methods for physics.
(Like always I'm a bit confused about where exactly I should post these questions, should it go to the homework forum? )


anyway as I was reading the lecture notes I found this demonstration that if \vec{J} = 0 in Maxwell-Ampere's law satisfies the wave equation: \left( \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \right)\vec B = \vec 0 :

There is one small step I'm not sure why/how he did it.

he took the curl of \nabla \times\vec B, that is, \nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec B \right) = \nabla\left(\nabla\cdot\vec B\right) - \nabla^2\vec B

then since \nabla\cdot\vec B = 0 and \nabla\times\vec B = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t} he says \nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec B \right) = \nabla\left(\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right)

so far I understand everything, but now he says:
\mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\left(\nabla\times\vec E\right)}{\partial t} and it is this very last step that I'm not sure if it's allowed. And if is, why it is?

the rest of the demonstration follows easily, supposing this last step is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That step just says that time derivatives commute with the curl. You should try this out for yourself and see that it is so. (Basically it's true simply because partial derivatives commute and the basis vectors are not time-dependent.)

Just write out the curl of E, take the time derivative. Then write out the curl of the time derivative of E and they are identical.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You missed one:
$$ \left( \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}-\nabla^2 \right)\vec B = 0\\
\implies \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vec B =\nabla^2\vec B\\
\implies \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vec B = \nabla(\nabla\cdot\vec B)-\nabla\times (\nabla\times \vec B)$$

Note:
$$\nabla\cdot\vec B = 0\\
\nabla\times \vec B = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\vec E\\
\nabla\times \vec E = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\vec B$$

https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=m...0j5j0j69i60.3357j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
By Cairault's theorem [see http://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Clairaut's_theorem_on_equality_of_mixed_partials] continuous partial derivatives commute.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top