Help understanding theory of Charge distribution

AI Thread Summary
When two unequal charged conductors come into contact, charge redistributes until both conductors reach the same electric potential. This occurs because if the potentials were different, an electric field would exist at the connection point, causing a current to flow until equilibrium is achieved. While the charges on each conductor may differ, the potential must be equal to prevent an electric field from forming between them. The electric field outside each conductor can vary, particularly if the conductors are of different sizes, leading to different field strengths despite equal potentials. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping concepts related to Gauss' law and capacitors in physics.
eps1lon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone I am very new here so please don' be too harsh with me :shy: I hope I posted this in the right section. If I haven't, then please accept my apologies and can a mod please kindly move my post to the appropriate section?

Im taking a very basic physics class atm and I was having trouble understanding some theory behind the unit we are on right now (Gauss' law/capacitors/charges/potentials).

Yesterday my teacher left us with a question to think about and I'm having difficulty understanding the reasoning behind it. He asked that if there's two unequal charged conductors and they're brought into contact w/ each other, the charge will redistribute betw/ the two conductors in a fashion that...

Now, I think that they would become equally charged but one of my other friends brought up the point that the potential inside each conductor is the same and I'm not sure whether or not he's right. Anyone know what the correct answer to this abstract question?

As well, would someone please explain to me (if I'm wrong) if it could be possible that the field outside conductor 1 might be the same as the field outside conductor 2?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would the electric potential of each conductor be the same? Potential is dependent on q, which is not the same in each conductor.
 
Feldoh said:
Why would the electric potential of each conductor be the same? Potential is dependent on q, which is not the same in each conductor.

If the potential was not the same, there would be an electric field at the place where the conductors are connected and a current would flow until the conductors were at the same potential.
 
kamerling said:
If the potential was not the same, there would be an electric field at the place where the conductors are connected and a current would flow until the conductors were at the same potential.

So then would I be right in the sense that the conductors would become equally charged? I find it hard believing that the potential OUTSIDE the conductors would be equal so I think that viewpoint is wrong.
 
Just outside the conductors, the potential must be the same everywhere. but the electric field can be different.
If you have two spheres of unequal size, and you connect them with a wire, the spheres will have the same potential, but the electric field outside of the smaller sphere will be bigger.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top