Help with a Newtons Cooling Law Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to Newton's Law of Cooling, where a thermometer's temperature readings in a preheated oven are analyzed to determine the oven's temperature. The original poster presents their attempts to set up equations based on temperature readings over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the oven temperature (TR) using the formula for Newton's Law of Cooling, creating equations based on temperature readings at different times. They express concern about the complexity of their approach and question whether there is a simpler method.
  • Some participants suggest substituting values and simplifying the equations to find TR, while others point out potential sign errors and the implications of those errors on the results.
  • There is discussion about the temperature changes during the intervals and how they can be used to derive a more straightforward solution.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing suggestions and alternative approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding simplifying the calculations, and there is recognition of potential errors in the original setup. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the reasoning and explore different methods without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the signs in the equations and the implications of those signs on the calculations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the complexity of their derived equations and whether they are on the right track.

ZeromusX99
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thermometer reading 70o F is placed in an oven preheated to a constant temperature. Through a glass window in the over door, an observer records that the thermometer reads 110o F after 1/2 minute and 145o F after 1 minute. How hot is the oven.

Homework Equations


T(t)=(To-TR)ekt+TR

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so I let said
TR= Oven Temperature
To=70
To(.5)=110
To(1)=145

I then set up the general equation as
T(t) = (70-TR)ekt+TR

Then using the two times and temperatures I was given I created these two equations.
145=(70-TR)ek+TR
110=(70-TR)e.5k+TR

I then moved over the TR on the end over to the left side giving me these two equations
145-TR=(70-TR)ek
110-TR=(70-TR)e.5k

Dividing the top equation by the bottom i get
(145-TR)/(110-TR)=e.5k

Taking the natural log of both sides and then dividing by .5 gets me
k= 2*ln((145-TR)/(110-TR))

To me this seems like I may have overcomplicated something or made a mistake as plugging that value of k back into the equation seems like it would make solving for TR incredibly difficult, not even sure how I would be able to solve for TR using that value for k.

So what I'm asking is if the steps I took were the right ones to do and if I should go ahead and try to solve for TR using that value for k or if there is a simpler way. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, ZeromusX99.

You did all the hard work already!

giving me these two equations
145-TR=(70-TR)ek
110-TR=(70-TR)e.5k

Dividing the top equation by the bottom i get
(145-TR)/(110-TR)=e.5k


From this last equation, you can substitute your expression for e.5k into 110-TR=(70-TR)e.5k and solve for TR.
 
ZeromusX99 said:

Homework Equations


T(t)=(To-TR)ekt+TR
Whoa! This would say the final temperature is either plus or minus infinity.

You have a sign error.
<Long, tedious calculation elided>To me this seems like I may have overcomplicated something ...
Using your result, k= 2*ln((145-TR)/(110-TR)), what is e.5k? (It isn't all that complex.)

Note well: This is a valid approach but it will of course yield the wrong answer because of your sign error.Aside: There is a much easier approach. What happened in the second half minute?

EDIT
Your approach is fine. It will just happen to yield a negative value for k.
The comment about an easier approach is still valid.
 
Thanks for the suggestion Billy Bob substituting for e.5k worked, guess I was just over thinking things.

Also, thanks to your suggestion D H of looking at the second half minute, where temperature increased by 35, I found the simpler way of doing the calculation TR, I'll go ahead and post it here

Instead of dividing I just subtract the equations I initially listed to get
35 = (70-TR)(e-k-e-.5k

Then do another subtraction of equations using my T(.5) and T(0)
110 = (70-TR)(e-.5k+TR
70 = (70-TR)+TR

I get
40 = (70-TR)(e-.5k-1)

dividing my
35 = (70-TR)(e-k-e-.5k)
by
40 = (70-TR)(e-.5k-1)
then gets me
7/8 = (e-k-e-.5k)/(e-.5k-1)

pulling an e-.5k from the numerator then gives me
7/8 = e-.5k(e-.5k-1)/(e-.5k-1)
(e-.5k-1) cancels leaving me with
7/8 = e-.5k

natural of both sides gives me ln(7/8) = -.5k so
k= -2ln(7/8)

Plugging this into my equation
40 = (70-TR)(e-.5k-1)
gives me
40 = (70-TR)(eln(7/8)-1)
which is just
40 = (70-TR)((7/8)-1)
leaving me with
40 = (70-TR)(-1/8)
multipling both sides by -1/8 gives me
-320 = 70 - TR[/SUB
Add TR and 320 to both sides then gives me
TR[/SUB = 390

Hehe next time I'll remember to make it -kt as well
 
ZeromusX99 said:
TR = 390
Correct.

You didn't quite get the gist of my hint.
Write Newton's law of cooling as

T(t)-T_R = (T_0-T_R)e^{-kt}

During the first half minute the temperature rose from 70o F to 110o F:

110-T_R = (70-T_R)e^{-kt/2}

from which

e^{-kt/2} = \frac{110-T_R}{70-T_R}

During the next half minute the temperature rose from 110o F to 145oo F. Thus

145-T_R = (110-T_R)e^{-kt/2}

Substituting the expression for \exp(-kt/2) in the above,

(145-T_R)(70-T_R) = (110-T_R)^2

Simplifying,

\aligned<br /> 10150-215T_R+T_R^2 &amp;= 12100-220T_R+T_R^2 \\<br /> (220-215)T_R &amp;= (12100-10150) \\<br /> T_R &amp;=390<br /> \endaligned
 
Ah I understand now thanks for all the help D H
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
24K