Help with a triple integral in spherical coordinates

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating a triple integral in spherical coordinates for the function (x² + y²) over the region between two spheres. The user initially struggles with the boundaries and the correct volume element, dV, which should be r² sin(φ) dr dθ dφ. There is confusion regarding the order of integration and the notation used for spherical coordinates, with some participants clarifying that r is commonly used instead of ρ. Ultimately, the user realizes their mistake in defining dV and corrects their approach, leading to a better understanding of the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent notation and correct integration techniques in solving spherical coordinate integrals.
Kaldanis
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Use spherical coordinates.

Evaluate\int\int\int_{E}(x^{2}+y^{2}) dV where E lies between the spheres x2 + y2 + z2 = 9 and x2 + y2 + z2 = 25.



The attempt at a solution

I think my problem may be with my boundaries. From the given equations, I work them out to be:

ρ = 3 to 5
φ = 0 to π
θ = 0 to 2π

This gives me the triple integral \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{5}_{3}(x^{2}+y^{2}) dV which becomes \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{5}_{3}(ρ sinφ cos θ)2+(ρ sinφ sin θ)2 ∂ρ∂φ∂θ


Is this integral correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kaldanis! :smile:

your limits look ok, but dV is not dρdφdθ, is it? :wink:

(and why are you using "∂" ? :confused:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Kaldanis! :smile:

your limits look ok, but dV is not dρdφdθ, is it? :wink:

(and why are you using "∂" ? :confused:)


Hi tiny-tim :smile:

Should it be dρdθdφ? I've been trying to work through and learn from my book but it's very difficult to understand. I'm having trouble deciding which order to integrate things. Also I've noticed people using r instead of ρ but I don't think that matters to much, it's still from 3 to 5.

(I had no reason for using ∂, it was just close to ρ! I won't use it again on here:shy:)
 
Hi Kaldanis! :smile:
Kaldanis said:
Should it be dρdθdφ?

No.

You need to learn:

the volume element in spherical coordinates is dV = r2sinθ drdθdφ …​

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheri..._and_differentiation_in_spherical_coordinates :smile:

(and of course you also need to learn the volume element in cylindrical coordinates)
I'm having trouble deciding which order to integrate things. Also I've noticed people using r instead of ρ but I don't think that matters to much, it's still from 3 to 5.

the order of integration never matters (though usually one order is easier than the others!)

and yes, i use r for both spherical and cylindrical coordinates, but i believe a lot of people use r for spherical and ρ for cylindrical

ρ for spherical is fairly uncommon, but as you say it doesn't really matter (but r is easier to type! :biggrin:)
 
Multiplication is commutative, so your differential quantities can be multiplied and any order and will still be correct. You're missing some non-differential terms out front of your expression.

Edit: Ninja'd
 
Thank you both for explaining in detail, especially Tim. I'll go study it some more and come back with an answer for you to check. :)
 
I don't think this is right. It's a lot to write out in latex so I'll summarise it!

\int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{5}_{3} [(r sinφ cosθ)2+(r sinφ sinθ)2]r2sinθ drdθdφ

= \int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0} (2882/5)sin(θ)sin2(φ) dθdφ

This equals 0 so the final answer is 0? I always doubt it when I calculate a volume to be 0.
 
Everything seems ok to me.

Why do you say that equals 0?
 
Last edited:
Xishem said:
Everything seems ok to me.

Why do you say that equals 0?

If the first part is definitely correct, then I have to integrate \int^{\pi}_{0}\int^{2\pi}_{0} (2882/5)sin(θ)sin2(φ) dθdφ. Evaluating (2882/5)sin(θ)sin2 from 0 to 2π gives me zero, which means the final integral is also zero. Since the answer isn't zero I think my beginning equation must be incorrect? :frown:
 
  • #10
[Edited out various confusions]

...

I think I found the issue. Your definition of dV is inconsistent with your angle definitions. It should be dV=r^2 sin\phi\ dr\ d\theta\ d\phi
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Xishem said:
[Edited out various confusions]

...

I think I found the issue. Your definition of dV is inconsistent with your angle definitions. It should be dV=r^2 sin\phi\ dr\ d\theta\ d\phi

Thank you! I was just talking with a friend and he also pointed out that I was using theta when I should be using phi. Now I have the correct answer and understand where I messed up.

:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K