Help with an investment matrix word problem

kdubb22
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Help with an investment matrix word problem!

Can anyone give me the 3 equations in general form that I need to solve this matrix?

A person will put 30% of his investment into a stock fund that earns a 9% annual rate of return. He will put 20% in precious metals currently growing at 40% and the remainder into bond funds earning 3%. His goal is to have $4000 of interest income. How much should he put into each investment?

One of the equations should be the equation for the statement about interest.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


I don't think this is a matrix kind of problem...it is a single equation:

(0.3xM)x(1.09) + (0.2xM)x(1.40) + (0.5xM)x(1.03) - M = 4000

M is the amount of money that needs to be invested to get 4000 of interest income
 


kdubb22 said:
Can anyone give me the 3 equations in general form that I need to solve this matrix?

A person will put 30% of his investment into a stock fund that earns a 9% annual rate of return. He will put 20% in precious metals currently growing at 40% and the remainder into bond funds earning 3%. His goal is to have $4000 of interest income. How much should he put into each investment?

One of the equations should be the equation for the statement about interest.
Do you really mean interest should be $4000, or total return? The reason I ask is that only the bonds return interest.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top