Help with Electrochemistry Lab: Al+3, Cu+2, Fe+3, Zn+2, KNO3

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikesown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the electrochemical reactions involving Al+3, Cu+2, Fe+3, Zn+2, and KNO3 in a lab setup using a salt bridge made from filter paper soaked in KNO3. The user is unsure about how to correctly identify oxidation and reduction reactions, as both half-cells contain positive ions. They provide specific half-reactions and their standard reduction potentials but lack clarity on the overall cell reactions. A response highlights the need for a complete half-cell setup and questions whether any reactions occurred between the nitrate and metal ions. Understanding the oxidation states and identifying the correct half-reactions is crucial for interpreting the lab results accurately.
mikesown
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm very confused with an electrochemistry lab. For the lab, we used Al+3, Cu+2, Fe+3, Zn+2, and KNO3. The setup was wells with all of the solutions in them. We soaked a piece of paper(filter paper) in KNO3 for the reactions, then used the paper as a salt bridge between the solutions of the ions for all combinations(i.e. Cu+2 with Fe+3, Fe+3 with Zn+2 etc.). What I'm confused with is how to write the reactions as both cells have positive ions in them, making them both reduction reactions, unless I'm missing something horribly wrong. Can someone help me? I have no clue what the oxidation reactions are. This is what I have so far:
<br /> \subsection{\ce{Al^{+3}} and \ce{Cu^{+2}}}<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Cu^{+2}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Cu^{+2} +2e^{-} -&gt; Cu} .34V<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Al^{+3}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Al^{+3} + 3e^{-} -&gt; Al} -1.66V <br /> \subsection{\ce{Cu^{+2}} and \ce{Fe^{+3}}}<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Cu^{+2}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Cu^{+2} +2e^{-} -&gt; Cu} .34V<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Fe^{+3}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Fe^{+3} + e^{-} -&gt; Fe^{+2}} .77V<br /> \subsection{\ce{Fe^{+3}} and \ce{Zn^{+2}}}<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Fe^{+3}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Fe^{+3} + e^{-} -&gt; Fe^{+2}} .77V<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Zn^{+2}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Zn^{+2} + 2e^{-} -&gt; Zn} -.76V<br /> \subsection{\ce{Al^{+3}} and \ce{Fe^{+3}}}<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Al^{+3}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Al^{+3} + 3e^{-} -&gt; Al} -1.66V <br /> \paragraph{\ce{Fe^{+3}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Fe^{+3} + e^{-} -&gt; Fe^{+2}} .77V<br /> \subsection{\ce{Al^{+3}} and \ce{Zn^{+2}}}<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Al^{+3}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Al^{+3} + 3e^{-} -&gt; Al} -1.66V <br /> \paragraph{\ce{Zn^{+2}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Zn^{+2} + 2e^{-} -&gt; Zn} -.76V<br /> \subsection{\ce{Cu^{+2}} and \ce{Zn^{+2}}}<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Cu^{+2}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Cu^{+2} +2e^{-} -&gt; Cu} .34V<br /> \paragraph{\ce{Zn^{+2}} half reaction}<br /> \ce{Zn^{+2} + 2e^{-} -&gt; Zn} -.76V<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have not stated what counter half cell was used for each have reaction which you listed. You would not expect much with just a half cell plus a salt bridge. Did you have reactions between the Nitrate and a metal ion?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top