Help with error analysis ly needed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the errors in time (t) and range (x) for a projectile experiment involving a metal ball fired at an angle. The participant struggles with error propagation, initially obtaining an incorrect error value for t. They describe their method of calculating errors for various components, including sin(θ) and initial speed (V), but express confusion over the large error results. A helpful response suggests using calculus for a more accurate error calculation and highlights the importance of converting angle measurements to radians. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in error analysis to achieve valid results.
slasakai
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Help with error analysis! urgently needed

Homework Statement


Using the theoretical prediction of t, find the errors of both t and x, . The problem is based on an experiment I did in Labs, In which a small metal ball was fired at 40° (uncertainty 0.5°) to the horizontal, at a height,y= 1.095m (with uncertainty of 0.005m) and fired at another measured quantity of initial speed V=5.23 m/s(uncertainty of 0.01m/s). and t is the time taken to hit the ground and x is the range of the ball.


Homework Equations



y=y0 - (Vsinθ)t - (0.5g)t^2

using quadratic equation to solve for t

t=((Vsinθ+ sqrt((Vsinθ)^2 + (2gy))/g

and later plug in value of t
into equation x=(Vcos40)t for x

also we are instructed to ignore the uncertainty on the constant g

The Attempt at a Solution



putting in values t=0.926 s(3sf) and although I cannot type all of my working here, I used a series of steps calculating the errors on individual functions of the equation for t and slowly combining them, however it keeps resulting in an error of 1.17616421... which obviously cannot be correct as this is larger than the predicted value! I'm clearly making a mistake somewhere, a solution will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks gneill, I see how not including any working would make it difficult to find my mistake. I will try my best to describe the method I used here.

I used the functional approach to calculate all the errors, as I couldn't really understand the calculus method.

here goes:

1. I first calculated the error on sinθ, using α=abs(cosθ) * error on sinθ = 0.3830222216

2. Then the error on Vsinθ, using α=sqrt((errorV/V)^2 + (errorsinθ/sinθ)^2) * Vsinθ = 2.003216532

3. Then the error on (Vsinθ)^2 , α=abs(2*Vsinθ) * (error on Vsinθ) = 13.4687433 [this value is the one where I start to doubt myself]

4. Then I calculate the error on 2gy using α= abs(2g) * (error on value of y) = 0.0981
[wasnt completely sure about taking g to be a constant despite being told to ignore the uncertainty]

5. combining errors of the (Vsinθ)^2 + (2gy) using α= sqrt( errora^2 + errorb^2) = 13.46910059 [an obviously massive value]

6. propogating this error through a power of 0.5, using same functional approach = 1.176164221

7. finally adding the errors of everything under the sqrt sign and the Vsinθ outside it using

α= sqrt( errora^2 + errorb^2) gives such a ridiculous answer = appx 2.3, which is so wrong...

I know this was a bad way to write it out, but if anyone can follow it I would greatly appreciate it
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi slasakai. Welcome to Physics Forums.

There's not much we can do to find your error without seeing the work. But I can tell you that the result for the error in t should be closer to 0.001 seconds than 1 s.

If you're proficient with calculus and taking derivatives, you can find the error for the whole expression at once via:

$$\delta t = \sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{d \theta}\right)^2\delta \theta^2 +
\left(\frac{df}{dv}\right)^2\delta v^2 +
\left(\frac{df}{dy}\right)^2\delta y^2 }$$
where ##f(\theta, v, y)## is the function for the time that you found and the derivatives are taken to be partial derivatives. The ##\delta \theta, \delta v, ## and ##\delta y## are the measurement errors.
 
slasakai said:
1. I first calculated the error on sinθ, using α=abs(cosθ) * error on sinθ = 0.3830222216
That looks like the error (in degrees) of theta. That's not the error in sin theta. Need to convert to radians.
 
haruspex said:
That looks like the error (in degrees) of theta. That's not the error in sin theta. Need to convert to radians.

thank you so mcuh haruspex, you have literally helped me so much by spotting that error. It was driving me nuts trying to figure out where I'd one wrong
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
424
Replies
1
Views
544
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
677
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top