Help with infinite sequences and series

suprajzturbo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member warned that template must be used and an effort shown
upload_2015-9-29_6-6-11.png

upload_2015-9-29_6-5-20.png


I tried the comparison test for one B but not sure if I am right. Think it could also be a ratio test because of the variable exponent. I'm lost totally lost on number one A. Also, I have the answer for the first part of three but don't know how to do the second part of it by comparing.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For A, do you know that 1+ 2+ 3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + k= \frac{k(k+1)}{2}?
For B, \sqrt{k}- \sqrt{k+1}= \frac{(\sqrt{k}- \sqrt{k+1})(\sqrt{k}+ \sqrt{k+ 1}}{\sqrt{k}+ \sqrt{k+1}}= \frac{-1}{\sqrt{k}+ \sqrt{k+1}}

For 3, you say you have already determined the values of p such that the given series converges. Okay, for what values of p does \sum_{n= 1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^p} converge?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hint: For 1(a) first recall the formula for the first ##k## natural numbers, then use partial fraction decomposition. After that, you will see lots of things cancelling.
 
suprajzturbo said:
View attachment 89511
View attachment 89510

I tried the comparison test for one B but not sure if I am right. Think it could also be a ratio test because of the variable exponent. I'm lost totally lost on number one A. Also, I have the answer for the first part of three but don't know how to do the second part of it by comparing.

Thanks

Do you know how to evaluate the sum ##1+2+3 + \cdots + k##? I cannot believe you have not seen it before, and if not, try a Google search.
 
Ray, isn't the limit of k the summation? So, it would be infinity? I just finished reading sequences and series but prof. is already 3 sections ahead. Stewart's Calculus isn't helping so these instructional google videos (e.g. Khan Academy and prof. Leonard) slow me down. Halls of ivy, how did you get rid of the variable exponent? Krylov, I'm not really good at partial fraction decomposition and the only formula I know is two from geometric series and just bunch of theorems at the moment.
 
suprajzturbo said:
Ray, isn't the limit of k the summation? So, it would be infinity? I just finished reading sequences and series but prof. is already 3 sections ahead. Stewart's Calculus isn't helping so these instructional google videos (e.g. Khan Academy and prof. Leonard) slow me down. Halls of ivy, how did you get rid of the variable exponent? Krylov, I'm not really good at partial fraction decomposition and the only formula I know is two from geometric series and just bunch of theorems at the moment.

In 1(a) your sum has the form
S = \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1+2} + \frac{1}{1+2+3} + \cdots + \frac{1}{1+2+ \cdots + k} + \cdots
I am asking you if you can find a formula for the ##k##th term of the sum; later on, you can worry about whether the sum is convergent. But first, you need to get the kth term in a more manageable form.

As I said, if you do not know the sum in the denominator of term k, you can go to the library and look it up, or nowadays do an on-line search.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top