Help with infinite square well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a particle in a one-dimensional infinite square well. The original poster seeks to determine the probability of the particle being in a specific energy eigenstate given its initial wave function and whether this probability changes over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization of the wave function and the expression of the wave function as a linear combination of energy eigenstates. Questions arise regarding the derivation of coefficients for these eigenstates and the implications of symmetry in the wave function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with hints and concepts related to the problem. Some have calculated coefficients for specific eigenstates and are questioning the results, particularly regarding the behavior of even and odd eigenstates. There is a recognition of the need for clarification on the normalization of eigenstates and the implications of orthogonality.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the properties of the wave function, such as symmetry, and how these properties affect the coefficients of the energy eigenstates. Participants are also navigating the constraints of their understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, including expectation values and normalization integrals.

kcirick
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Question:
A particle of mass m moves in 1-D infinite square well. at t=0, its wave function is [itex]\Psi\left(x,t=0\right)=A\left(a^{2}-x^{2}\right)[/itex]. Find the probability that the particle is in the energy eigenstate [itex]E_{n}[/itex]. Does the probability change with time?

What I have so far:
So far I just found the normalization constant for the wave function at t=0:

[tex]\int|\Psi\left(x,t=0\right)|^{2}dx=1[/tex]
[tex]...A=\frac{1}{4}\sqrt\frac{15}{a^{5}}[/tex]

So we have [tex]\Psi\left(x, t=0\right)=\frac{1}{4}\sqrt\frac{15}{a^{5}}\left(a^{2}-x^{2}\right)[/tex]

Now, because this is infinite square well, [itex]\Psi=0[/itex] at the boundary. From that, we can find out the energy eigenstate:
[tex]E_{n}=\frac{n^{2}\hbar^{2}\pi^{2}}{8ma^{2}}[/tex] (Derived in class)

But what to do from there? I don't know...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint #1: Any wave function can be expressed as a linear combination of energy eigenstates:

[tex]\Psi = c_1 \Psi_1 + c_2 \Psi_2 + ...[/tex]

where (if the functions are all normalized) [itex]c_1^* c_1[/itex] is the probability of being in eigenstate [itex]\Psi_1[/itex], etc.

Hint #2: If the eigenstates are normalized, what is the value of

[tex]\int {\Psi_m^* \Psi_n} dx[/tex]

(a) when m = n, and (b) when m ≠ n?
 
[tex]\Psi = c_1 \psi_1 + c_2 \psi_2 + ...[/tex]
where:
[tex]\psi_1=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}cos\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)x, n=1,3,5,...[/tex]
[tex]\psi_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}sin\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)x,n=2,4,6,...[/tex]
Because it is an infinite square well.

Then according to a note that I have,
[tex]c_1=\int^{a}_{-a}\Psi(x)\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}cos\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)xdx[/tex]
[tex]c_2=\int^{a}_{-a}\Psi(x)\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}sin\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)xdx[/tex]
where:
[tex]\Psi\left(x, t=0\right)=\frac{1}{4}\sqrt\frac{15}{a^{5}}\left(a^{2}-x^{2}\right)[/tex]

But where did that relation come from? Can someone help me out?

Also, to jtbell: How is the probability of being in eigenstate [itex]\psi_1 = c_1*c_1[/itex]? Can you please explain? Thank you!
 
Last edited:
kcirick said:
[tex]\Psi = c_1 \psi_1 + c_2 \psi_2 + ...[/tex]
where:
[tex]\psi_1=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}cos\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)x, n=1,3,5,...[/tex]
[tex]\psi_2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}sin\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)x,n=2,4,6,...[/tex]
Because it is an infinite square well.

I'd prefer to write that as [itex]cos\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}x\right)[/itex], and similarly for the other one with the sine. Most people would read your version as "calculate [itex]\frac{n\pi}{2a}[/itex], find the cosine of the result, and finally multiply by x", which is not the same as "calculate [itex]\frac{n\pi}{2a} x[/itex] and find the cosine of the result."

Then according to a note that I have,
[tex]c_1=\int^{a}_{-a}\Psi(x)\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}cos\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)xdx[/tex]
[tex]c_2=\int^{a}_{-a}\Psi(x)\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}sin\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}\right)xdx[/tex]

I think those should be:

[tex]c_n=\int^{a}_{-a}\Psi(x)\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}cos\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}x\right)dx, n = 1,3,5...[/tex]

[tex]c_n=\int^{a}_{-a}\Psi(x)\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}sin\left(\frac{n\pi}{2a}x\right)dx, n = 2,4,6...[/tex]

But where did that relation come from?

Both of the above relations can be written as

[tex]c_n=\int\Psi^*_n(x)\Psi(x)dx[/tex]

To derive this, start with your first equation at the top, multiply both sides by [itex]\Psi^*_n(x)[/itex], and integrate:

[tex]\int \Psi^*_n \Psi dx = c_1 \int \Psi^*_n \Psi_1 dx + c_2 \int \Psi^*_n \Psi_2 dx + ...[/tex]

Now take note of hint #2 in my earlier posting. Your textbook almost certainly gives the answer to this hint, and possibly so do your notes. Look for the words "orthogonal" or "orthonormal". :smile:

Also, to jtbell: How is the probability of being in eigenstate [itex]\psi_1 = c_1*c_1[/itex]?

I think the usual way to show this (or at least make it plausible) is to calculate the expectation value of the energy for [itex]\Psi[/itex], using the expansion given by your first equation at the top. Have you studied expectation values yet?
 
Thanks jtbell. Things are starting to become clear, but still the entire QM concept isn't very clear to me, and may never will be...

Anyways, I calculated [itex]c_n[/itex] for both even n and odd n. For the odd n, I get a very nice answer:
[tex]c_n = \left(-1\right)^{\frac{n-1}{2}}\frac{4\sqrt{15}}{n\pi}, n=1,3,5,...[/tex]

But for the even n, I get [itex]c_n=0[/itex] (because sin is an anti-symmetric function). Is this normal?

We did do Expectation values in class, but all I really know is that:
[tex]\left<E\right>=\int\Psi^*E\Psi dx[/tex]
That is the next part of my question, I will get to that eventually.

I really appreciate this help, because to me QM stuff doesn't really make sense to me. Anyway, thank you!
 
kcirick said:
But for the even n, I get [itex]c_n=0[/itex] (because sin is an anti-symmetric function). Is this normal?

That's exactly what I would expect, because your given [itex]\Psi[/itex] is symmetric about the origin (or "even"). It can't contain any contributions from anti-symmetric ("odd") eigenstates.
 
jtbell said:
Hint #2: If the eigenstates are normalized, what is the value of

[tex]\int {\Psi_m^* \Psi_n} dx[/tex]

(a) when m = n, and (b) when m ≠ n?

Well, when m ≠ n, the integral is equal to 0, but neither my textbook nor my lecture notes tells me the answer when m = n. From intuition, my guess is 1, but is it correct? If it is, then I can do the following:

[tex]P = \int \Psi^* \Psi dx[/tex]

Since [itex]\Psi = c_{n}\psi_{n} [/tex] for energy eigenstate [itex]E_{n}[/itex],<br /> <br /> [tex]P = \int c_{n}^*\psi_{n}^* c_{n}\psi_{n}dx[/tex]<br /> [tex]P = c_{n}^* c_{n} \int\psi_{n}^* \psi_{n}[/tex]<br /> [tex]P = c_{n}^* c_{n}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Is this allowed?[/itex]
 
kcirick said:
Well, when m ≠ n, the integral is equal to 0, but neither my textbook nor my lecture notes tells me the answer when m = n. From intuition, my guess is 1, but is it correct?

Yes, but you shouldn't need pure intuition to realize this. If m = n, then the integral is just the normalization integral for the function in question. If the function is normalized already, this integral is...? :smile:

If it is, then I can do the following:

[tex]P = \int \Psi^* \Psi dx[/tex]

Since [itex]\Psi = c_{n}\psi_{n} [/tex] for energy eigenstate [itex]E_{n}[/itex],[/itex]
[itex] <br /> No, in general, you have to assume that [itex]\Psi[/itex] is a linear combination of <b>all</b> the energy eigenstates:<br /> <br /> [tex]\Psi = c_1 \psi_1 + c_2 \psi_2 + ... + c_n \psi_n + ...[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]P = \int \Psi^*\Psi dx = \int (c_1^* \psi_1^* + c_2^* \psi_2^* + ... + c_n^* \psi_n^* + ...)(c_1 \psi_1 + c_2 \psi_2 + ... + c_n \psi_n + ...) dx[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now multiply this out. You can't write the whole thing out, of course, because there are an infinite number of terms (n goes to infinity), but if you go out to, say, n = 3, that should be enough to see the pattern.[/itex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K