Help with Maxwell: Understanding 6 Dimensions of Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter hikaru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell
hikaru
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I read a school subject book by test measures and have intended in doubt.

What I can understand is not readily found in search of other references either. Please help it.

When I considered gravity, dynamic energy thought about a (x,y,z) coordinate and a speed ingredient of a molecule at the same time to demand it with kinetic energy + potential energy and was able to understand that I thought as 6 dimensions of space.

f(x,y,z,vx,xy,xz)dxdydzdvxdvydvz = C exp(- ε /kT)dxdydzdvxdvydvz

 * ε = m/2(vx^2 + vy^2 + vz^2) + φ(x,y,z)

Though I understand it, how will be that C is the fixed number if I try to really demand C?
I tried to demand it from oneself, but it is it and has it at all and is not confident of a different value whenever I demand it. It is C = (mg/2kTS)*(m/2kT π )^ for the time being(3/2)  I became the value that was とsufferings from unjustness tea to say, ; It was it in this way when I thought as the case that I classified into a container expensive endlessly of cross-section area S. . .

In addition, how should the mean of dynamic energy demand it in this case? In addition, as for the found value, it seems to be it in a value different from mean (3kT/2) of dynamic energy of the ideal air which does not consider gravity hereby. Why seems to be ・ ・ ・?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I read a previous post from you. Your english is a little confusing so it is a little hard to understand what you mean. I think what you should do to calculate C is to require the distribution function to be normalized. So that
\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x,y,z,v_x,v_y,v_z) dx dy dz dv_x dv_y dv_z = 1
You can can calculate this by the use of Guassian integrals and then you should obtain the value of C.
 
Thanks a lot.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top