Help with Orbital Mechanics: First Post

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's challenges in understanding orbital mechanics, specifically in calculating the specific angular momentum, satellite inclination, ascending node vector, and right ascension of the ascending node from given R and V vectors. The specific angular momentum can be calculated using the formula r × v, where "r" is the position vector and "v" is the velocity vector. Understanding the significance of each variable in the formulas is crucial for grasping the concepts. The student is encouraged to refer to their textbook for detailed explanations and to consult additional resources like Wikipedia for further clarification. Mastering these calculations is essential for a solid foundation in orbital mechanics.
Cghnasa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
First post here, I'm a student in a BS in Space Studies program and I'm having a little trouble.

I have

R vectors = rI rJ rK
V vectors= vI vJ vK

( I'm not putting in numbers to avoid someone doing my homework for me)

I am having a hard time wraping my brain around getting from that to

a. What is the specific angular momentum of the satellite?
b. What is the satellite's inclination?
c. Calculate the ascending node vector.
d. What is the spacecraft 's right ascension of the ascending node?

Can someone show me how to figure these out and tell me why?
I think by biggest problem is that I want to know why I need to plug this number into that spot in the formula.

Thanks for your help!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is just r×p, where p is the linear momentum vector, p=mv. "Specific" in this case means "divided by mass". Specific angular momentum is thus angular momentum divided by mass, or just r×v.

As for computing Keplerian orbital elements given a state vector, your textbook is the best bet. The specific angular momentum is key in computing several of those elements. If your textbook is inscrutable, perhaps this wikipedia page and the links on it will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_state_vectors.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top