Help with Paradoxical Groups: Vectors, Finite Groups, F3 & Z

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSG31883
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of paradoxical groups in relation to vectors and finite groups. It addresses the existence of a unique transformation C that maps two independent vectors in R2 to another pair of vectors. The definition of a G-paradoxical set is clarified, emphasizing the need for a group action on a set. The conversation also questions the paradoxical nature of specific groups like F3 and Z, while highlighting the ambiguity in the term "not very paradoxical." Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of precise definitions and conditions in understanding paradoxical groups.
JSG31883
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need some serious help in paradoxical groups!

1) Given vectors v1,v2 in R2 and w1,w2 in R2 (none lieing on a line thru the origin), show that you can find a unique C such that Cv1=w1 and Cv2=w2.

2) Show that a finite group is not very paradoxical.

3) Is F3 paradoxical? Is Z?


THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
would you care to define paradoxical?

1 is easy if you pick a basis. , though that is unnecessary, just define a map satisfying such and extend by linaerity to all of R^2 and note that two independent vectors in R^2 are a basis (you mean w1 w2 not lying on the same line, and v1 v2 not lying on the same line).
 
Def of Paradoxical:

G acts on X, E is subset of X.
E is G-paradoxical if there exists pairwise disjoin sets A1, ... , An, B1,..., Bm inside E and g1,...,gn, h1,...,hm inside G with E=(union)(Ai)=(union)(Bj).

If X is metric space and G acts by isometries, and we have A's, B's, g's, and h's as above, we have G-very paradoxical.
 
Last edited:
Why didn't you say it was to help you do an assignment in a rush... my interest has dropped off, sorry. YOu might consider that your definition of paradoxical requres G to act on a set (your examples in the question don't) and you have not given a quantification of "not very" for paradoxical.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top