Testing Help with picking specialisation (physics/economics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Link
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A joint master's degree in Engineering Physics with a minor in Economics is being pursued, with a focus on maximizing earning potential without pursuing a PhD. The individual is considering specializations in Engineering Physics, specifically Applied Mechanics, Optics and Photonics, Theoretical/Mathematical Physics, or Atomic Physics and Elementary Particles. In Economics, the options include Microeconomics, Macroeconomics, International Economics, and Finance. The aim is to identify the best combination of these specializations to align with a career as an engineering manager, which is highlighted as a lucrative path according to labor market insights. The discussion also touches on the importance of passion in career choices, suggesting that personal interest should play a role in decision-making.
Link
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Doing a joint masters degree with major in Engineering Physics and Minor in Economics. I have been evaluating my interests and come up with a shortlist of potential specialisations i am interested to work with in the future. I do not want to do a phD. My goal is to earn as much money as possible, and according to Labor Departments occupational outlook handbook, engineering manager is the way to go. I'd appreciate if someone could comment on the best combination of specialisations that will be useful for this purpose from the list below.

Possible specialisations in Eng. Physics (pick one):
Applied Mechanics
Optics and Photonics
Theoretical/Mathematical Physics
Atomic Physics and Elementary Particles

Possible specialisations in Economics (pick two):
Microeconomics
Macroeconomics
International Economics (Trade, monetary policy)
Finance



Thanks!o:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so many problems with this methodology for picking a career. Do what you are passionate about.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top