Help with Proving X ⊂ P(N) - Cardinality of Continuum

  • Thread starter somebd
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, to prove the existence of X ⊂ P(N), we need to find an almost disjoint family, which is a family of infinite subsets of N that have finite intersections. This can be done by defining A_X for each X ⊂ N, which is countable if X is countable and has the cardinality of the continuum if X is infinite. To ensure that A_X ⊂ P(N), we can use a bijective function from a countable set of finite subsets of N to N. This gives us the set of all A_X as desired.
  • #1
somebd
5
0
Prove that exist X ⊂ P(N)

P(N) is a power set of natural numbers
1 cardinality of X is continuum
2 for each A (element of X) in X, A is infinite
3 for each A and B in X, A is not equal to B, A intersection with B is finite

Please, I have no idea how to solve this :eek:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What you're searching for is called an almost disjoint family. A full treatise on this can be found in "Set theory, an introduction to independence proofs" by K. Kunen.

Here is a sketch of the proof:
If [tex]X\subseteq \mathbb{N}[/tex], define [tex]A_X=\{X\cap \{0,...,n\}~\vert~n\in \mathbb{N}\}[/tex]. If X is countable, then [tex]A_X[/tex] is countable. If [tex]X\neq Y[/tex], then [tex]A_X\cap A_Y[/tex] is finite.
Let [tex]\mathcal{A}=\{A_X~\vert~X\subseteq \mathbb{N}~\text{and X infinite}\}[/tex]. Then X has the cardinality of the continuum.
The problem is now, that it is not true that [tex]\mathcal{A}\subseteq P(\mathbb{N})[/tex]. To solve this, let [tex]I=\{A\subseteq \mathbb{N}~\vert~A~\text{finite}\}[/tex]. It is not that hard to see that I is countable. Let [tex]f[/tex] be a bijective function from I to [tex]\mathbb{N}[/tex]. Then [tex]\{f(A)~\vert~A\in\mathcal{A}\}[/tex] is the set you want...
 
  • #3
Wow, thanks you very much for the fast response and solution idea :)
 

1. What is the meaning of "X ⊂ P(N)" in the context of proving the cardinality of continuum?

In set theory, "X ⊂ P(N)" means that the set X is a subset of the power set of the natural numbers. In other words, X contains elements that are also sets of natural numbers.

2. Why is proving the cardinality of continuum important in mathematics?

Proving the cardinality of continuum is important because it helps us understand the size and complexity of infinite sets. It also has implications in various branches of mathematics, such as logic, topology, and analysis.

3. What is the continuum hypothesis and how does it relate to proving X ⊂ P(N)?

The continuum hypothesis is a statement in set theory that states there is no set with cardinality strictly between the cardinality of the natural numbers and the cardinality of the real numbers. Proving X ⊂ P(N) is one of the steps in attempting to prove or disprove the continuum hypothesis.

4. Can you give an example of a set within P(N) that satisfies X ⊂ P(N)?

One example of a set within P(N) that satisfies X ⊂ P(N) is the set of all finite subsets of the natural numbers. These subsets are themselves sets of natural numbers, and therefore, are included in the power set of natural numbers.

5. What are some strategies for proving X ⊂ P(N) and the cardinality of continuum?

There are multiple strategies for proving X ⊂ P(N) and the cardinality of continuum, including using Cantor's diagonal argument or constructing a bijection between the sets. Another strategy is to use the fact that the cardinality of the power set of a set is always greater than the cardinality of the original set. However, proving the cardinality of continuum is still an open problem in mathematics and has not been definitively solved.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
706
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
942
Back
Top