Help with Ptolemy metric space

ypatia
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ptolemy metric space. Help!

The problem is :
"Let x,y,z,t belongs to R^n where d(x,y)=||x-y||.
Show that(Ptolemy's inequality):
d(x,y)d(z,t)<=d(x,z)d(y,t)+d(x,t)d(y,z)"



I have found this related to the topic paper but I cannot show that the Euclidean space R^n is Ptolemy.
The paper in the second page "2.Preliminaries" says that "To show that the Euclidean space R^n is Ptolemy, consider again four points x,y,z,w. Applying a suitable Mobius transformation we can assume that z is a midpoint of y and w, i.e. |yz|=|zw|=1/2 |yw|. For this configuration...."
But how can we extract from the above paragraph that the Euclidean space R^n is Ptolemy and which is the "suitable Mobius transformation"??


Thanks anyone in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In a tendon quadrangle
\ square ABCD
look at the triangle
 \ triangle ABC
with the separate point D on its circumference with radius r and the associated base triangle
\ triangle LMN
, The formula for calculating the side lengths of a base triangle then returns for
\ triangle LMN
:

{\ begin {aligned} & | MN | & = {\ frac {| AD | \ cdot | BC |} {2r}} \\ & | LN | & = {\ frac {| BD | \ cdot | AC |} {2r}} \\ & | LM | & = {\ frac {| CD | \ cdot | AB |} {2r}} \\\ end {aligned}}

220px-Ptolemy_inequality_proof.svg.png


But now that D is on the perimeter of
\ triangle ABC
is, is
\ triangle LMN
degenerate and its sides lie on the corresponding Simson line , so that the two sides LM and NM complement each other to the third side LN . It therefore applies:

| LM | + | NM | = | LN |

With the above equations, this provides:

| AB | \ cdot | CD | + | BC | \ cdot | AD | = | AC | \ cdot | BD |

If D is not on the circumference, then due to the triangle inequality for
\ triangle LMN
:

|> | | LM | + | NM LN |

The above equations then provide the inequality of Ptolemy:

| AB | \ cdot | CD | + | BC | \ cdot | AD |> | AC | \ cdot | BD |
Source: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satz_von_Ptolemäus
Translation: Google chrome
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top