Help With Raising and Lowering Indices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dm4b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of manipulating indices in the context of Linearized Gravity within General Relativity, specifically using the Minkowski metric. The equation presented, \(\partial^{\sigma}h_{\sigma}_{\mu}=\eta^{\sigma}^{\epsilon}\partial_{\epsilon}h_{\sigma}_{\mu}=\partial_{\epsilon}h_{\mu}^{\epsilon}=\partial_{\sigma}h_{\mu}^{\sigma}\), is confirmed to be valid due to the constancy of the Minkowski metric, allowing the metric to be moved inside the partial derivative. However, this manipulation does not hold for general metrics, where \(\partial_\alpha g^{\alpha \beta}\) is not necessarily zero. The use of covariant derivatives resolves this issue, as \(\nabla_\alpha g^{\alpha \beta} = 0\) holds true.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Linearized Gravity concepts
  • Familiarity with the Minkowski metric in General Relativity
  • Knowledge of index notation and tensor calculus
  • Comprehension of covariant derivatives and the Levi-Civita connection
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Minkowski metric in detail
  • Learn about covariant derivatives and their applications in General Relativity
  • Explore the implications of index manipulation in different metric contexts
  • Investigate the Levi-Civita connection and its role in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students specializing in General Relativity, particularly those focusing on tensor analysis and the manipulation of indices in gravitational theories.

dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
This is from Linearized Gravity in General Relativity, where h is the perturbation on the background Minkowski metyric.

Is the following valid?

[tex]\partial^{\sigma}h_{\sigma}_{\mu}=\eta^{\sigma}^{\epsilon}\partial_{\epsilon}h_{\sigma}_{\mu}=\partial_{\epsilon}h_{\mu}^{\epsilon}=\partial_{\sigma}h_{\mu}^{\sigma}[/tex]

As you can see on the third term, I use the metric (neta) to raise an index on h instead of the partial now. Is that valid?

Since the metric is full of constants in the Minkowski metric, seems like it would be valid to move it inside the partial and operate on h. BUT, seems like this would not be true in general, maybe?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is valid, because the Minkowski metric is constant (so [itex]\partial_\epsilon \eta^{\sigma \epsilon} = 0[/itex]). However, for general metrics g, [itex]\partial_\alpha g^{\alpha \beta}[/itex] is not necessarily zero. The problem disappears if you replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives, though, because (by definition of the Levi-Civita connection) in this case [itex]\nabla_\alpha g^{\alpha \beta} = 0[/itex].
 
Thanks adriank.

Had this posted in another forum here too and we just came to the same conclusion. It's nice to see it backed up here as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
828
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K