Raising/Lowering Metric Indices: Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWCY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Perturbation
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15
TL;DR
What are the rules?
If I have a metric of the form ##g_{\mu \nu} = f_{\mu \nu} + h_{\mu \nu}## where ##f_{\mu \nu}## is the background metric and ##h_{\mu \nu}## the perturbation, how do I raise and lower indices of tensors?

For instance, I was told that ##G_{ \ \nu}^{\mu} = f^{\mu \nu '} G_{\nu ' \nu }##. But shouldn't ##G_{ \ \nu}^{\mu} = g^{\mu \nu '} G_{\nu ' \nu }## be true as well? What exactly are the "rules" behind these operations?

PS If the answer is related to differential geometry, could I be also be pointed to a (introductory) source that explains it?

Cheers.
 
on Phys.org
You raise and lower indices using the metric ##g## with upper or lower indices as appropriate. However, if you are perturbing the metric then the components of ##h## are small compared to those of ##f##, and components of ##(h)^2## and derivatives thereof are negligible.

I would imagine that if you expand out both tensors in ##g^{\mu\nu'}G_{\nu'\nu}## in terms of ##f## and ##h## you will find that it is equal to ##f^{\mu\nu'}G_{\nu'\nu}## plus terms like ##h^{\mu\nu'}h_{\nu'\nu}## and derivatives thereof, which you would neglect.
 
First realize that "raising" and "lowering" of indices are really just shortcuts:
Given [itex]v^a[/itex], then [itex]v_b \equiv v^a g_{ab}[/itex].
So, the real object is [itex]v^a g_{ab}[/itex], but it gets tiring to write that all of the time.
So, a convention is adopted to define the shortcut [itex]v_b[/itex].

So, [itex]v^a g_{ab}=v^a f_{ab}+v^a h_{ab}[/itex].
Which term do want to declare a shortcut for?The following references suggest using the "background" unperturbed metric (in your notation, [itex]f_{ab}[/itex]).From the following reference, a scan of Geroch's 1972 General Relativity notes [maybe posted by Ashtekar?]
http://www.gravity.psu.edu/links/general_relativity_notes.pdfSee Section 39. Linearization (page 143 [pdf page 145]).
On page 144 [pdf page 146] between equations (156) and (157), Geroch declares
Geroch said:
We shall hereafter raise and lower indices with [itex]g_{ab}[/itex], the unperturbed metric".
which makes sense because your unperturbed metric likely corresponds to an exact solution [not necessarily Minkowski] that you know about, rather than some perturbed-metric.

However, the notation in those notes might be a little confusing since
in the first paragraph of that section,
he started by writing [itex]g_{ab}=\eta_{ab}+\gamma_{ab}[/itex] as an example when perturbing from Minkowski spacetime.
But between equations (153) and (154), he essentially does the following:

Using a family of metrics [itex]g_{ab}(\lambda)[/itex], where [itex]\lambda \in[0,1)[/itex]
the perturbed metric is [in general]
[itex] \begin{align*}<br /> g_{ab}(\lambda)<br /> &=<br /> \left(g_{ab}(\lambda)\right|_{\lambda=0}+\lambda\ \frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(g_{ab}(\lambda)\right|_{\lambda=0}\\<br /> &=<br /> g_{ab}(0)+\lambda\ \frac{d}{d\lambda}\left(g_{ab}(\lambda)\right|_{\lambda=0}<br /> \end{align*}[/itex]
in terms of the unperturbed metric [itex]g_{ab}(0)[/itex] (which he now calls "[itex]g_{ab}"[/itex] ... between (153) and (154).)

For another reference, look at Wald's text [which is influenced by Geroch, as noted in the preface]
  • Section 4.4 Linearized Gravity: The Newtonian Limit and Gravitational Radiation,
    Wald said:
    [itex]g_{ab} =\eta_{ab} + \gamma_{ab}[/itex]
    ...
    In order not to have [itex]\gamma_{ab}[/itex] hidden in a raised or lowered index,
    it is convenient to raise and lower tensor indices with [itex]\eta_{ab}[/itex] and [itex]\eta^{ab}[/itex] rather than [itex]g_{ab}[/itex] and [itex]g^{ab}[/itex] . We will adopt this notational convention for the remainder of this section with one exception :
    The tensor [itex]g^{ab}[/itex] itself will still denote the inverse metric, not [itex]\eta^{ac}\eta^{bd}g_{cd}[/itex]. It should be noted that in the linear
    approximation we have
    [itex]g^{ab}= \eta^{ab} -\gamma^{ab}[/itex] (4 .4 .2)
    since the composition of the right-hand sides of equations (4 .4.1) and (4 .4 .2) differs
    from the identity operator only by terms quadratic in [itex]\gamma_{ab}[/itex].
  • Section 7.5 on Perturbations,
    Wald said:
    [itex]g_{ab} = {}^0 g_{ab}+\gamma_{ab}[/itex]
    ...
    (between Eq 7.5.14 and 7.5.15)
    Since all quantities aside from [itex]\gamma_{ab}[/itex], now refer only to the background metric [itex]{}^0 g_{ab}[/itex], we
    shall in the following drop the superscript zero on the background metric and its
    derivative operator, and we shall use the background metric [itex]g_{ab}[/itex] and its inverse [itex]g^{ab}[/itex] to raise and lower indices.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K