Help with reversing a function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trekky0623
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
To reverse a function and isolate x, one must determine if the function is one-to-one, as only such functions have inverses. If the function is not one-to-one, it cannot be inverted, which can be tested by finding two values where f(x) equals f(y) or by using the horizontal line test on its graph. If the function fails these tests, numerical methods may be a more viable approach than seeking an analytic solution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the function's properties before attempting to find its inverse. Ultimately, determining the function's invertibility is crucial for solving for x in terms of f(x).
Trekky0623
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I need to know how to start this.

Basically, I'm trying to isolate x on one side, so that I can input f(x) and solve for x, instead of the other way around.

Image: http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/8869/tempng8.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
don't think that is possible
 
Why would you ever want to invert such a useless function?

If it's homework and you're having trouble solving for x in terms of f(x), then there's a good chance the function is not one-to-one and thus has no inverse. The way you would prove this, though, is to find two values, x and y, such that f(x) = f(y). Alternatively, if you can plot the graph of the function, you can use a horizontal line test to see if it's one-to-one. If you can find a horizontal line that passes through two distinct points on the graph, then you can't invert it.
 
Alternatively, if you just want the answer for yourself, you should consider numerical methods instead of analytic solutions.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top