Help with special relativity problem (off by a factor of 2)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a special relativity problem involving the heating of a swimming pool using a fusion reaction. The original calculation for the cost of tritium to raise the pool temperature was found to be incorrect, yielding a result that was double the expected answer in the textbook. The mistake was identified as a misunderstanding of the units, specifically confusing atoms with molecules per cubic centimeter. Participants emphasized the importance of recognizing the distinction between atomic and molecular quantities in gas calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful attention to detail in physics and chemistry problems.
weston.pace
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Special Relativity A.P French Problem 1-9

An eccentric billionaire decides to sterilize his 106 liter swimming pool by boiling the water in it. For heating purposes he uses the fusion reaction:

1H + 3H → 4He + radiant energy

Assuming the heating system is 20% efficient, how much does he pay for the tritium (3H) to raise the pool temperature from 20°C to 100°C? It takes 4.2 joules to raise 1g of water through 1°C. Tritium costs about $5 per cm3 of gas at STP.

Homework Equations



E = mc2

The Attempt at a Solution



Total energy required:
E_{total} = 4.2 \frac{J}{g°C} * 10^9 g * 80°C = 3.36*10^{11} J

Energy Generated per reaction:
E_{reaction} = m_{diff} * c^{2}
E_{reaction} = ((1.0081 + 3.0170) - 4.0039)amu * 1.6603*10^{-27} * (3*10^{8}\frac{m}{s})^{2} = 3.1682 * 10^{-12} J

Atoms per cubic centimeter of gas at STP:

\frac{atoms}{cm^3}=6.0221*10^{23} * \frac{1}{22.711} * 10^{-3} = 2.6516 * 10^{19}

Final Result (1/0.2) is to account for 20% efficiency:
cost=$5*\frac{1}{0.2} * \frac{E_{total}}{\frac{E_{reaction}}{\frac{atoms}{cm^3}}} =~ $100,000

The answer in the book is $50,000, which would imply I'm off by a factor of two. I've looked over this for some time and can't see my mistake. Can anyone help me spot what I've missed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is "molecules per cubic centimeter", not atoms.

Tritium gas is T2.
That is a weird setup. He will spend the first billion (at least) for the fusion reactor.
 
mfb said:
That is a weird setup. He will spend the first billion (at least) for the fusion reactor.

I think irrationality is a requirement in physics textbooks problems.

Thanks for the help, that would certainly yield the right answer. Is this just something that should have been obvious from a chemistry standpoint? My chemistry is really rusty.
 
Hmm... it is something you should know, but there is a big difference between knowing it and thinking of it.
 
weston.pace said:
Is this just something that should have been obvious from a chemistry standpoint? My chemistry is really rusty.

Chemistry or physics, the thing to remember is that gases are made of molecules, and the Avogadro constant is how many molecules a mole of gas contains. Then you just need to find what a molecule of the given gas is.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top