Help with tensor formulation of special relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the tensor formulation of special relativity, specifically the equation F_αβ = g_αγ*g_βδ*F^(γδ). The metric tensor g_αβ is defined as a diagonal matrix in four dimensions, with g_00 = 1 and g_11 = g_22 = g_33 = -1. The user struggles with understanding the right-hand side of the equation, mistaking the tensor product for matrix multiplication. The correct interpretation involves summation over dummy indices and recognizing that the operation is a contraction of rank-two tensors, ultimately leading to the expression F_{\alpha\beta} = g_{\alpha \gamma} F^{\gamma \delta} (g^{T})_{\delta \beta}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Tensor algebra and notation
  • Understanding of the metric tensor in special relativity
  • Knowledge of rank-two tensors and their operations
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic tensor concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the metric tensor in general relativity
  • Learn about tensor contraction and its applications
  • Explore the electromagnetic tensor and its role in physics
  • Investigate matrix representations of tensors and their operations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity and tensor calculus, as well as educators looking to clarify tensor operations in electromagnetic theory.

lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Hi, I can't seem to understand the following formula in my professor's lecture notes:

F_αβ = g_αγ*g_βδ*F^(γδ)

Homework Equations


Where g_αβ is the diagonal matrix in 4 dimensions with g_00 = 1 and g_11 = g_22 = g_33 = -1 and F^(γδ) is the electromagnetic tensor with c=1.

The Attempt at a Solution


I keep wanting to perform matrix multiplication, but g_αγ*g_bδ would just be the unit matrix if we did this, right? I don't understand how to perform the RHS of this equation...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonewolf219 said:
I keep wanting to perform matrix multiplication, but g_αγ*g_bδ would just be the unit matrix if we did this, right?
##g_{\alpha\gamma} g_{\beta \delta}## is not matrix multiplication - it is an object with four free indices that are uncorrelated. In tensorial language, matrix multiplication corresponds to a contraction of two rank-two tensors. For example, ##A_{i j} B^{j k}## can be viewed as a matrix multiplication - try to compare this with the usual component-wise multiplication definition of matrix multiplication before reading on!

As for how to evaluate the RHS of the equation, well we have to perform a summation over the dummy indices. As an example, for ##\alpha = \beta = 0##, we have
F_{0 0} = \sum_{\gamma = 0}^{3}\sum_{\delta = 0}^{3} g_{0\gamma} g_{0\delta} F^{\gamma \delta}
where I have put the summations in explicitly just to show things clearly.

Of course there is an easier way to do it since these are rank-two tensors - recall earlier that I mentioned that matrix multiplication involves contracting one index in a product of two such tensors. So, ##C_{i k} = A_{i j} B^{j k}## can be viewed as taking the i-th row of A and multiply it element-wise with the k-th column of B, which is what we do when we multiply matrices in the usual sense. If we rewrite the given equation as
F_{\alpha\beta} = g_{\alpha \gamma} F^{\gamma \delta} (g^{T})_{\delta \beta}
(note that I've taken the transpose of the second ##g## to reverse the indices so that we can interpret it as matrix multiplication)
then we can write
\mathbf{F}' = \mathbf{g}\,\mathbf{F}\,\mathbf{g}^{T}
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K