Help with the matrix representation of <-|+|->. Does "+"=|+>?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the matrix representation of quantum states, specifically the operators S_x and S_y. Participants are attempting to simplify various equations involving kets and bras, particularly the notation used by Sakurai, which some find confusing. There is clarification on the meaning of "+" and "-" in the context of operators, with emphasis on their roles in the outer product of kets and bras. The conversation highlights the importance of clear notation in quantum mechanics to avoid misunderstandings. Overall, the exchange aids in grasping the mathematical representation of quantum operators.
yoyopizza
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I'm working on problem 1.10 in Sakurai (1.8 in version 1 or 2), where I'm supposed to prove the commutation relation on [S_i,S_j]=i\epsilon_{ijk}h_bar*S_k
Relevant Equations
S_x=hbar/2(|+><-|+|-><+|)
S_y=ihbar/2(-|+><-|+|-><+|)
S_z=hbar/2(|+><+|-|-><-|)
Trying to use <+|+>=1=<-|-> and <-|+>=0 to prove each iteration of the equation, so I have 6 different versions to prove. But the part I'm currently stuck on is understanding how to simplify any given version. I've written out [S_x,S_y]=S_xS_y\psi-S_yS_x\psi and expanded it in terms of the |+>,|-> kets and bras. Then using associativity I've broken up some of the three term components like <-|+|-> into (<-|)(+|->) which I'm assuming will allow me to remove some terms, however now I don't really understand what + or - means in the absence of being inside a ket or bra. I can't imagine they equal their usual matrix representation because then +=|+> which makes no sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of Sakurai's notation is a bit wild and woolly in my opinion. What we have here, for example, is:
$$S_x = \frac \hbar 2[(|+\rangle \langle -|) + (|-\rangle \langle +|)]$$ I.e. it is the sum of two operators, each formed by the outer product of a ket with a bra.

Does that help?

PS The ##+## in the middle is the plain old symbol for (in this case) operator addition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, yoyopizza and TSny
Ahhh, that does help. So to expand on that, ## S_y=\frac{i\hbar}{2}(-|+><-|)+(|-><+|)## i assume. And this would imply that the first negative sign there just means negative ##|+>## Thanks
 
Last edited:
yoyopizza said:
Ahhh, that does help. So to expand on that, ## S_y=\frac{i\hbar}{2}(-|+><-|)+(|-><+|)## i assume. And this would imply that the first negative sign there just means negative ##|+>## Thanks
Yes, I don't know why he didn't write: $$S_y=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}[(|+><-|)-(|-><+|)]$$
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
Yes, I don't know why he didn't write: $$S_y=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$

Yeah that would have been much more clear. Thanks a ton.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top