Help with the Separation of Variables and Integration

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
75 replies · 5K views
hold on I think I got something
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
silento said:
du= -2Bvdv
I was looking for this:

$$ \frac{du}{dx} = - 2 \beta v \frac{dv}{dx} $$

Which is what basically what you wrote (Don't drop the independent variable from the notation).
 
Alright...that makes sense. Interested to see where we go from here
 
silento said:
Alright...that makes sense. Interested to see where we go from here
look at the RHS of that result, and compare it to the RHS of your original equation. Notice anything?
 
looks like we moved that drag force over to the right hand side
 
silento said:
looks like we moved that drag force over to the right hand side
I meant examine similarities between post 16 and post 32.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: silento
1709088565283.png
. however -2B is in place of the mass
 
silento said:
View attachment 340974 . however -2B is in place of the mass
luckily, that's just a constant... Quite literally solve for ##v \frac{dv}{dx}## in terms of ##\frac{du}{dx}## in post 32, and plug it into post 16 equation. Don't forget about the ##u## substitution made in 16 either. If you do it correctly, watch the equation transform into a butterfly.

I 've got to try to get to bed though. Good luck.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: silento
silento said:
Try again. everything should be in terms of ##u,x##..no more ##v## in the equation.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: silento
From post 32
1709089429538.png
then I plugged that into the answer from post 16 in place of vdv/dx. I don't see where I'm going wrong
 
silento said:
From post 32 View attachment 340976 then I plugged that into the answer from post 16 in place of vdv/dx. I don't see where I'm going wrong
in post 16 eqn, substitute on the LHS to get rid of ##v## and the constant... remember I defined ##u = \varphi - \beta v^2##.

So you end with a simple ODE in terms of variable ##u## and ##x##.
 
wait a minute. I think I see where you are going with this
 
correct me in i'm wrong, but we are going to move the du to the LHS. Then we can sub v back in for u. Then velocity would be the only variable on the LHS along with the constants. On the right hand side it would just be 1/-2Bdx which is just constants???
 
silento said:
correct me in i'm wrong, but we are going to move the du to the LHS. Then we can sub v back in for u. Then velocity would be the only variable on the LHS along with the constants. On the right hand side it would just be 1/-2Bdx which is just constants???
Solve for ##u(x)## from the resulting ODE. After you’ve done that you can change back to ##v## and it’s values etc…
 
silento said:
Im sorry but what's ODE?
Ordinary differential equation. The equation we just developed. Linear. separable, ODE.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: silento
solve for u(x)? I guess I was wrong. I was thinking I could just do
1709094112747.png
. Then I can plug u back in and change u to v. So, all the v would be on the left while the x is on the right. I can then take the integral of both sides and solve for xf-xi
 

Attachments

  • 1709090670502.png
    1709090670502.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
2%29.gif
(1/2) is to the power. After I get u(x) then I change it back to v then do I integrate? 120 to 0 is bounds for velocity and I need to find ∆x which is just xf-xi which are the bounds for dx(position)
 
Last edited:
but there is two answers. a + and a - since we were taking the square root
 
The equation you need to solve is:

$$\frac{- 2 \beta}{m} u = \frac{du}{dx} $$

Separate variable's and integrate.

And if you don't reply in Latex math formatting I'm calling it quits with a clear conscience...
See: LaTeX Guide
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: chwala
\begin{equation}
\ln|u| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
 
silento said:
\begin{equation}
\ln|u| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
Integrate ##u## with limits ##u_f, u_o##. You can leave the ##x## the way it is assuming ##x_o=0##. Otherwise good.
 
so let me think about this. u is velocity from 54 m/s to 0 m/s. xf is what I'm solving for. Would I only integrate the LHS?
 
silento said:
so let me think about this. u is velocity from 54 m/s to 0 m/s. xf is what I'm solving for. Would I only integrate the LHS?
##u## is not ##v##. Go back and look at what ##u## is…
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: silento
The basic equation is fine. But it’s missing a constant of integration. That is why I suggest you “re do it” integrating it as a definite integral between limits ##u_f## and ##u_o##.
 
\begin{equation}
\ln|u_f| - \ln|u_o| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
 
silento said:
\begin{equation}
\ln|u_f| - \ln|u_o| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
Now combine the logs