Help with the Separation of Variables and Integration

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of applying separation of variables and integration in a physics context involving changing velocity and forces. Participants clarify the need to separate variables correctly and integrate with respect to the appropriate bounds, particularly emphasizing the distinction between constants and variables. The conversation highlights the importance of using LaTeX for clear mathematical communication and the application of the chain rule in differentiation. Ultimately, the goal is to derive an ordinary differential equation (ODE) that can be solved to find the change in position (∆x) based on the changing velocity. The thread concludes with guidance on evaluating the final expression for position after integrating.
  • #31
hold on I think I got something
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
silento said:
du= -2Bvdv
I was looking for this:

$$ \frac{du}{dx} = - 2 \beta v \frac{dv}{dx} $$

Which is what basically what you wrote (Don't drop the independent variable from the notation).
 
  • #33
Alright...that makes sense. Interested to see where we go from here
 
  • #34
silento said:
Alright...that makes sense. Interested to see where we go from here
look at the RHS of that result, and compare it to the RHS of your original equation. Notice anything?
 
  • #35
looks like we moved that drag force over to the right hand side
 
  • #36
silento said:
looks like we moved that drag force over to the right hand side
I meant examine similarities between post 16 and post 32.
 
  • #37
1709088565283.png
. however -2B is in place of the mass
 
  • #38
silento said:
View attachment 340974 . however -2B is in place of the mass
luckily, that's just a constant... Quite literally solve for ##v \frac{dv}{dx}## in terms of ##\frac{du}{dx}## in post 32, and plug it into post 16 equation. Don't forget about the ##u## substitution made in 16 either. If you do it correctly, watch the equation transform into a butterfly.

I 've got to try to get to bed though. Good luck.
 
  • #39
1709089155412.png
 
  • #40
silento said:
Try again. everything should be in terms of ##u,x##..no more ##v## in the equation.
 
  • #41
From post 32
1709089429538.png
then I plugged that into the answer from post 16 in place of vdv/dx. I don't see where I'm going wrong
 
  • #42
silento said:
From post 32 View attachment 340976 then I plugged that into the answer from post 16 in place of vdv/dx. I don't see where I'm going wrong
in post 16 eqn, substitute on the LHS to get rid of ##v## and teh constant... remember I defined ##u = \varphi - \beta v^2##.

So you end with a simple ODE in terms of variable ##u## and ##x##.
 
  • #43
Oh right!
1709089846461.png
 
  • #44
wait a minute. I think I see where you are going with this
 
  • #45
correct me in i'm wrong, but we are going to move the du to the LHS. Then we can sub v back in for u. Then velocity would be the only variable on the LHS along with the constants. On the right hand side it would just be 1/-2Bdx which is just constants???
 
  • #46
silento said:
correct me in i'm wrong, but we are going to move the du to the LHS. Then we can sub v back in for u. Then velocity would be the only variable on the LHS along with the constants. On the right hand side it would just be 1/-2Bdx which is just constants???
Solve for ##u(x)## from the resulting ODE. After you’ve done that you can change back to ##v## and it’s values etc…
 
  • #47
Im sorry but what's ODE?
 
  • #48
silento said:
Im sorry but what's ODE?
Ordinary differential equation. The equation we just developed. Linear. separable, ODE.
 
  • #49
solve for u(x)? I guess I was wrong. I was thinking I could just do
1709094112747.png
. Then I can plug u back in and change u to v. So, all the v would be on the left while the x is on the right. I can then take the integral of both sides and solve for xf-xi
 

Attachments

  • 1709090670502.png
    1709090670502.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 60
Last edited:
  • #50
2%29.gif
(1/2) is to the power. After I get u(x) then I change it back to v then do I integrate? 120 to 0 is bounds for velocity and I need to find ∆x which is just xf-xi which are the bounds for dx(position)
 
Last edited:
  • #51
but there is two answers. a + and a - since we were taking the square root
 
  • #52
1709246831195.png
?
 
  • #53
The equation you need to solve is:

$$\frac{- 2 \beta}{m} u = \frac{du}{dx} $$

Separate variable's and integrate.

And if you don't reply in Latex math formatting I'm calling it quits with a clear conscience...
See: LaTeX Guide
 
  • #54
\begin{equation}
\ln|u| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
 
  • #55
silento said:
\begin{equation}
\ln|u| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
Integrate ##u## with limits ##u_f, u_o##. You can leave the ##x## the way it is assuming ##x_o=0##. Otherwise good.
 
  • #56
so let me think about this. u is velocity from 54 m/s to 0 m/s. xf is what I'm solving for. Would I only integrate the LHS?
 
  • #57
silento said:
so let me think about this. u is velocity from 54 m/s to 0 m/s. xf is what I'm solving for. Would I only integrate the LHS?
##u## is not ##v##. Go back and look at what ##u## is…
 
  • #58
The basic equation is fine. But it’s missing a constant of integration. That is why I suggest you “re do it” integrating it as a definite integral between limits ##u_f## and ##u_o##.
 
  • #59
\begin{equation}
\ln|u_f| - \ln|u_o| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
 
  • #60
silento said:
\begin{equation}
\ln|u_f| - \ln|u_o| = -\frac{2B}{m}x
\end{equation}
Now combine the logs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K