Help with thin lenses and uncertanty

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedGuy1606
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the uncertainty of 1/X involves using the values of X plus and minus its uncertainty, ΔX, to find the difference, which gives the uncertainty in 1/X. For absolute uncertainty, the correct approach is to use the modified values of X in the formula to determine the change in the calculated value. To plot object distance and image distance for a thin lens, one should relate these distances to the focal length using the thin lens equation, which can be represented as a straight line. Understanding the relationship between these variables is crucial for the practical. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper time management and preparation for the practical assignment.
RedGuy1606
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Heyy this is my first time on here and I'm only doing first year physics so my understanding might not be up to scratch =/

I'm doing a practical on thin lenses where we have to do a various amount of measurements and calculations to do with convex lenses. However I'm not very confident with some of the things needed.

If anyone could help me with how to calculate the uncertainty of 1/X (where X has an uncertainty of delta X) and how I would plot the object distance and image distance to create a straight line (It hints to examine the relationship between these distances and focal length in the thin lens equation)

Any help would be greatly appreciated and if I confused you with really bad descriptions, sorry :confused:
 
Science news on Phys.org
The brute-force way to calculate the uncertainty is to calculate 1 / (x + \Delta x) and 1 / (x - \Delta x). The difference between them is \Delta (1 / x).
 
jtbell said:
The brute-force way to calculate the uncertainty is to calculate 1 / (x + \Delta x) and 1 / (x - \Delta x). The difference between them is \Delta (1 / x).

Does that work with absolute uncertainty too (just read the sheet again and realized it said absolute and not the other one which I've forgotten the name of)
 
Correction: for \Delta(1/x), use either

\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{1 + \Delta x}[/itex]<br /> <br /> <b>or</b><br /> <br /> \frac{1}{x - \Delta x} - \frac{1}{x}[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The formula I gave before gives you about twice the value you want.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; In general, for anything (call it y) calculated as a formula of x, to find the uncertainty:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; 1. Calculate the formula using the &amp;quot;original&amp;quot; value of x, to get an &amp;quot;unmodified&amp;quot; value of y.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; 2. Calculate &lt;b&gt;either&lt;/b&gt; x + \Delta x &lt;b&gt;or&lt;/b&gt; x - \Delta x, and substitute it into the formula to get a &amp;quot;modified&amp;quot; value of y.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; 3. Find the difference between the two values of y. The absolute value is \Delta y.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; This uses the absolute uncertainty. If you have a measurement like x = 10.3 cm +/- 0.2 cm, then in my notation \Delta x is 0.2 cm.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; If you want the relative or percent uncertainty, to a pretty good approximation it&amp;#039;s the same for both x and 1/x. Check this if you like, by calculating the absolute uncertainties for an example, then use them to get the relative uncertainties.
 
Do you know the equation connecting object distance, image distance and focal length?If not look it up, compare this to the general equation for a straight line and you should see it.If you get stuck come back.
 
Alright I'll do that, thanks a bunch, my prac is today (Yeah I kinda planned my time badly) so wish me will :rolleyes:

Thanks again
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top