Help with total capacitance in parallel and in series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total capacitance required for a timer circuit in an elevator door mechanism. For the first scenario, a 35.4 µF capacitor is installed, and to achieve the target capacitance of 33.0 µF, an additional capacitor must be placed in series. In the second scenario, a 32.5 µF capacitor is present, and to meet the specification, an additional capacitor should be added in parallel. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the rules for combining capacitors in series and parallel to achieve the desired capacitance. Overall, the conversation highlights common misunderstandings in applying these formulas correctly.
complexc25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
According to its design specification, the timer circuit delaying the closing of an elevator door is to have a capacitance of 33.0 µF between two points A and B.
(a) When one circuit is being constructed, the inexpensive but durable capacitor installed between these two points is found to have capacitance 35.4 µF. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. Should it be in series or in parallel with the 35.4 µF capacitor? (in series)

What should be its capacitance?

(b) The next circuit comes down the assembly line with capacitance 32.5 µF between A and B. What additional capacitor should be installed in series or in parallel in that circuit, to meet the specification? (parallel)

a) Ct = C1 +C2
33uF = 35.4uF + C2
isn't C2 = 33fF - 34.5uF ??

b) (1/Ct) = (1/C1) + (1/C2)
isn't (1/C2) = (1/33uf) - (1/32.5uF) ??

Im lost here...any help will be apprecieated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a you have the right answers, but you did the method wrong. How did you manage to do that? Series capacitors add like parallel resistances and parallel add like series resistances. Swap your two procedures and you should be good.
 
complexc25 said:
According to its design specification, the timer circuit delaying the closing of an elevator door is to have a capacitance of 33.0 µF between two points A and B.
(a) When one circuit is being constructed, the inexpensive but durable capacitor installed between these two points is found to have capacitance 35.4 µF. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. To meet the specification, one additional capacitor can be placed between the two points. Should it be in series or in parallel with the 35.4 µF capacitor? (in series)

What should be its capacitance?

Consider the two calculation rules for combining capacitors in series and in parallel. You want the effective capacitance, as the result of putting two capacitors together, to be lower than the capacitance of the single capacitor presently in use. Which combination will allow you to come up with smaller capacitance?

(b) The next circuit comes down the assembly line with capacitance 32.5 µF between A and B. What additional capacitor should be installed in series or in parallel in that circuit, to meet the specification? (parallel)

This is a similar question, but now you want to end up with a larger effective capacitance. Will a series or a parallel combination get you a higher value?
 
thanx for the quick reply guys...dynamicsolo, i should have thought about both of ur conclusions...im dumb :s
 
complexc25 said:
thanx for the quick reply guys...dynamicsolo, i should have thought about both of ur conclusions...im dumb :s

Don't take it as a sign of being dumb -- unfortunately, equations and formulas in courses like these are not always taught with consideration of what happens to the numbers put into them...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top