Helping a prof with his research vs doing your own research.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
AI Thread Summary
Research experience primarily gained through assisting a professor is common among students applying to graduate school. Many applicants do not have independent research projects and still succeed in their applications. Graduate programs expect students to have collaborated with faculty, and it is typical for PhD candidates to work on ideas proposed by their advisors rather than developing entirely original concepts. While having independent research can be beneficial, it is not a strict requirement, and applicants can effectively convey their understanding of research roles in their personal statements. Claims of independent research without substantial guidance from faculty may not be credible for undergraduates. Overall, collaborative research experience is valued and considered normal in the academic path toward graduate studies.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
So all of my research experience so far has been done with helping a prof with his research. I haven't really done any independent research on my own. Is this the norm among students who apply to grad school? Is it not as good as me doing my own research? (and compared to students who have done their own research projects, is it a significant disadvantage?) Of course I can put it in my personal statement and say that I understood what my role was and the direction the research is supposed to take (e.g. show that I'm perfectly capable of having my own research project should I have the chance to do it)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's unusual for students who haven't already spent a few years in graduate school to know enough about a topic to come up with something original to study. Grad schools will expect you to have worked with a professor, and you'll be doing that in graduate school as well. Many people finish a PhD without having come up with very original ideas of their own and working on a suggestion from a professor instead.
 
Simfish said:
So all of my research experience so far has been done with helping a prof with his research. I haven't really done any independent research on my own.

Yes. It's normal. Also I don't think any research is truly independent, and if you find yourself a senior professor you'll find yourself talking with other professors and exchanging ideas.

Is it not as good as me doing my own research? (and compared to students who have done their own research projects, is it a significant disadvantage?)

I don't think that an undergraduate who writes a statement of purpose that claims that they have done their own research project without significant assistance and advice from a professor is going to be taken seriously.
 
Actually all my research paper are written on my own. Although I got some idea on the different references to make my research paper more academic one. Cause if you write your own research paper, you can explain it easily.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top