Here's the type of textbook I'm looking for. Does it exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lane4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Type
AI Thread Summary
A college physics graduate seeks a textbook focused on the fundamental concepts of precalculus or Calculus BC, emphasizing understanding over rote problem-solving. The desired material should cover key topics like integration by substitution without delving into tricks or general problem-solving techniques, making it suitable for self-study. A recommended resource is Khan Academy, which offers a series of videos that explain concepts intuitively, covering the first one to two semesters of college calculus. The platform is free and designed for independent learners, making it an effective alternative to traditional textbooks. This approach aims to deepen understanding of mathematical principles rather than just problem-solving skills.
Lane4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am a college physics grad. For many subtopics of precalculus or calculus, the following statement applies to me:

"I can easily solve problems that involve X, but I can't really tell you what X is or why it matters."

I'd like to spend some spare time to gain a strong understanding of the central concepts of precalculus or calculus that I only learned superficially.

Can anyone recommend a text to work from, based on the following criteria?

- Covers precalculus or Calculus BC material.
- Focused only on the fundamentals and central concepts. For example, I want to understand integration by substitution, but I don't need or want to review every substitution technique.
- NOT focused on (1) tricks, (2) rote problem solving, or (3) teaching general problem solving techniques
- Ideal for self study

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is a website I am using which many have heard of.

http://www.khanacademy.org/

I'm using it right now to learn Calculus. It's all 1 guy making all of the videos, and in each lesson he tries to explain it in a way so you can have intuition on why you're doing what you're doing.

Sal received his MBA from Harvard Business School. He also holds a Masters in electrical engineering and computer science, a BS in electrical engineering and computer science, and a BS in mathematics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Imo, it's a much better way of learning than traditional textbooks. In terms of calculus I believe he only covers the first 1-2 semester of college calculus in around 150-160 videos.

The various subjects he covers on his site:
rarjaw.png



It's not a textbook, but it is a very good source of learning on your own. All the videos on his site are separated nicely so you can find what you're looking for specifically.
Best thing of all, it's 100% free and he's dedicated his life to his site in hopes of providing better educations for students worldwide. Covering subject from K-12 and a bit into college.

He is helping to change the world with his site and has received quite large donations from people such as Bill Gates.

Good Luck.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top