I Heuristic for simple two-photon scattering problems

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
763
I'm afraid this question is going to be a bit hand-wavy, but I'm hoping for a way of thinking about two-photon scattering that would be helpful to a beginner but also give correct results.

The starting point is that, for two photons in SPDC and other similar cases, the phase difference is a uniform superpositiion from 0 to ##2\pi##.

Next, we consider scattering through a system that has 2 inputs and N outputs. This could be as simple as a beam splitter or something more complex, but let's say we know the amplitudes and phases to go from any input to any output.

Now we excite the two inputs with two coherent waves and vary their phase difference ##\Delta\phi## from 0 to ##2\pi##. For each phase difference value, we can find the power going to each output port. If we integrate that over ##\Delta\phi## from 0 to ##2\pi## we can get the expectation of the power, which is the expectation of the photon count at that port up to a constant.

My question is, isn't there a similar logic that says if we integrate "something" over 0 to ##2\pi## we can get the probability of seeing two photons at a certain port, and if we integrate something else, we can get the probability of seeing one photon "here" and another "there".

Hope that makes sense... o_O

And if that is possible, then how about three photons into three inputs -- can we double-integrate something over the phase difference between input A and B, as well as input B and C, to get the probability of seeing 2 photons over here and one over there?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Swamp Thing said:
Now we excite the two inputs with two coherent waves and vary their phase difference Δϕ from 0 to 2π. For each phase difference value, we can find the power going to each output port. If we integrate that over Δϕ from 0 to 2π we can get the expectation of the power, which is the expectation of the photon count at that port up to a constant.

In the last sentence in the quote, I mean that the same expectation of photon count, that we work out using coherent states as a test case, would also apply to non-coherent photons (Fock state) sent into the inputs of the same scattering problem, because non-coherent pairs have a Δϕ that is a superposition over 0 to 2π. And in a similar way, I'd like to derive probabilities for other classes of events as well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top