Hey guys, this is my theory of blackholes and how new parallel universes

aidantrembath
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
my theory of black holes, and the start of the universe,
ok ,all black holes go to central point of mass, all the central points of all the black holes combine to converge to a parallel universe, which takes the mass from our universe, to start the "big bang", when enough mass has been forced through the black holes of singularity,
this process with then trigger a big bang in a parallel universe.
so to consolidate, when the mass of one unverse, contracts, and travels through a black hole, it gets projected into a new "Parallel" unverse.
i have devised this theory of string theory by Dr. stephen Hawkin.
so guys, what do you think?
cheers,
aidan (aged 16)
 
Space news on Phys.org
A pretty good theory for a 16 yr old.

When I was 16 all I thought about was boobs.

Now at age 23, Its about half thinking about boobs, half thinking about science.

Good job kid, seriously. Keep up on that stuff. If you haven't seen it, check out the movie "the elegant universe" i have it. has to do with string theory and such...awesome stuff.
 
Hi Aiden. I don't know that your theory makes any physical sense, but I agree with LebLlama that it's good for you to be thinking about this stuff at such an early age. In addition to Elegant Universe, there's a book by Dr. Lisa Randall called "Warped Passages" which might be of interest to you. It actually deals with other dimensions and how they might actually be rolled up into the fundamental particles which make up our universe.
 
Hi Aidan, welcome to PF!

Unfortunately for this particular discussion, PF has a general rule of not discussing personal theories or speculations about physics. We had to put this rule in place because we were getting overrun with cranks and crackpots. We think it's great for people to get interested in science, but we think it's better for people to steer that interest into learning more about what is already known and what scientists are actually working on at the edges of science, rather than start off by inventing their own theories.

It takes a lot of study to get to the point where you can come up that is (a) genuinely new and (b) has a snowball's chance in hell of being correct. Even Real Scientists who seriously propose new theories turn out to be wrong most of the time.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top